Skip to content

Http V2 (Part 1): Add req sychroznier and built in resp types #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

YunchuWang
Copy link
Member

@YunchuWang YunchuWang commented Apr 2, 2024

  • Add request synchronizer interface for addressing route parameters synchronization from host rpc trigger metadata to http request payload
  • Add support for all fastapi supported built in response types which will be supported in http v2
  • tests

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.42%. Comparing base (ad5a21c) to head (531f575).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev      #23      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.64%   99.42%   +1.78%     
==========================================
  Files          12        8       -4     
  Lines         382      348      -34     
  Branches       23       92      +69     
==========================================
- Hits          373      346      -27     
+ Misses          8        1       -7     
  Partials        1        1              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.42% <100.00%> (+1.78%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@YunchuWang YunchuWang requested a review from gavin-aguiar April 3, 2024 17:29
@YunchuWang YunchuWang merged commit 1709e9f into dev Apr 3, 2024
@YunchuWang YunchuWang deleted the wangbill/add_req_sync_resp_types branch April 3, 2024 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants