Skip to content

Add E2E scenarios for common libs #1132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

pdthummar
Copy link
Contributor

@pdthummar pdthummar commented Oct 24, 2022

Description

Adding E2E scenarios for common libs

Fixes #


PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which has an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes in the description.
  • New Unit tests were added for the changes made and CI is passing.

Quality of Code and Contribution Guidelines

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1132 (71576cb) into dev (1c577b0) will decrease coverage by 52.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 71576cb differs from pull request most recent head fe93b1a. Consider uploading reports for the commit fe93b1a to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1132       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   83.87%   31.83%   -52.05%     
===========================================
  Files          34       34               
  Lines        1885     1885               
  Branches      362      361        -1     
===========================================
- Hits         1581      600      -981     
- Misses        233     1284     +1051     
+ Partials       71        1       -70     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 31.83% <ø> (-51.99%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...e_functions_worker/bindings/nullable_converters.py 21.62% <0.00%> (-78.38%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/functions.py 25.00% <0.00%> (-71.28%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/dispatcher.py 19.17% <0.00%> (-69.69%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/utils/tracing.py 31.81% <0.00%> (-68.19%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/utils/common.py 33.33% <0.00%> (-66.67%) ⬇️
.../shared_memory_data_transfer/file_accessor_unix.py 19.60% <0.00%> (-57.85%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/bindings/meta.py 25.30% <0.00%> (-57.84%) ⬇️
...s/shared_memory_data_transfer/shared_memory_map.py 28.57% <0.00%> (-55.36%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/extension.py 44.95% <0.00%> (-54.13%) ⬇️
azure_functions_worker/utils/dependency.py 33.08% <0.00%> (-53.39%) ⬇️
... and 14 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@ghost ghost removed the needs-author feedback label Oct 27, 2022
@pdthummar pdthummar merged commit 344d7a8 into dev Jan 25, 2023
@pdthummar pdthummar deleted the pthummar/add_e2e_libs_scenarios branch January 25, 2023 00:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants