-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Change spec to use criminal's incomes as additional rewards #1562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
FYI, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
LGTM. Let's wait for @ScarletBlue's review. |
@@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ The transaction that reports a double vote have occurred before **WITHDRAW_DELAY | |||
|
|||
The criminal loses all his deposit and rewards and is banned immediately; it is the only case where a validator set is changed during the term. | |||
|
|||
The informant receives all deposit and rewards(TBD) as prize money immediately. | |||
The informant receives the deposit of the criminal as prize money immediately. | |||
The express fee that the criminal would earn is used as additional rewards for diligent validators. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The express fee that the criminal would have earned is used as additional rewards for diligent validators.
Hi,
Currently, the informant receives deposit and rewards of the criminal as a prize.
However, it incentives for informants to wait for reporting to maximize their profits.
So I propose giving the deposit to the informant and using the incomes as additional rewards for diligent validators.