Skip to content

Conversation

jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented Apr 4, 2025

Constant-propagation of the band index would allow eliminating the branches in setindex! for structured matrices. These parallel the similar getindex definitions that already exist.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.03%. Comparing base (3e525a8) to head (d0d8279).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1259      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.01%   92.03%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines       15500    15540      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        14262    14302      +40     
  Misses       1238     1238              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jishnub jishnub added arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] performance Must go faster labels Apr 5, 2025
@jishnub jishnub force-pushed the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch from dbd4dff to d0d8279 Compare April 12, 2025 06:18
@jishnub jishnub force-pushed the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch from d0d8279 to 258102f Compare April 23, 2025 12:04
@jishnub jishnub merged commit 88dba5d into master Apr 25, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@jishnub jishnub deleted the jishnub/bandindex_setindex branch April 25, 2025 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] performance Must go faster
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants