correct printing of empty block inside ref #34559
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JeffBezanson
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2020
JeffBezanson
added
the
display and printing
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another follow-up to #33946. If people are skeptical about the usage of
(;;)for empty blocks here, we could also just print the ugly$(Expr(:block))instead.(nothing;)will do the same thing as(;;)most of the time, but parses completely differently and nothing stops users from assigning something different tonothing, so I don't think it makes sense to print it that way.