-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
REPL-only: Print a hint if the user types exit
in the REPL
#38522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to also print this if the input is "quit" (that's what e.g. GAP uses) ?
Anyway, I really like this PR, it fixes one of those tiny papercuts which seem irrelevant in isolation but add up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't object to also doing this for "quit", but I'll defer to @JeffBezanson.
I'd want to keep this limited to a very small set of inputs. For example, you can exit R by typing
q()
and pressing enter. But I definitely wouldn't want to print a hint if someone typesq
in the Julia REPL.I think it makes sense for
exit
because the corresponding functionexit()
is a function that actually exists in Julia. But we don't actually have aquit
function in Julia.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But I don't feel strongly either way. Happy to add
quit
, also happy to leave it out.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I think we should add it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like what the python repl does:
It stops printing the message if
quit
is defined as a variable. Stylish! I think we should do this too.Can be checked with
Base.isbindingresolved(Main, :exit) && isdefined(Main, :exit)
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In python, that's not magic, it is just literally the definition of show for that default variable:
The equivalent here would be:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which would have been #21362