inference: add missing LimitedAccuracy
handlings
#42034
Merged
+16
−9
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found we need to handle
LimitedAccuracy
(i.e. collect itslimitations into the current frame and unwrap its type) whenever
we do inter-procedural inference. Especially, we need to handle
it where we use
abstract_call_method
andabstract_call_method_with_const_args
.Otherwise we may encounter nested
LimitedAccuracy
, which is really notexpected to exist. So this commit also adds the assertion that checks we never
form nested
LimitedAccuracy
.I encountered errors due to this when analyzing JET by JET itself,
probably because its codebase makes heavy use of
invoke
.I couldn't pack them up as simple test cases though.