Skip to content

Conversation

chuangz0
Copy link
Collaborator

@chuangz0 chuangz0 commented Aug 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Optimization
    • When context TEP and gen DEP, each dp rank of gen will request kv cache from context tp rank0 before.
      We changed it so that dp rank will request kv cache from context tp_rank = gen_dp_rank%tp_num.
  • Tests
    • Updated test assertions to reflect new cache sending logic and improved test readability.

Description

Test Coverage

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id (OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.

--disable-reuse-test (OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--test-backend "pytorch, cpp" (OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".

--detailed-log (OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.

--debug (OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in the stage-list parameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md
and the scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.py helper.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

@chuangz0 chuangz0 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2025 06:47
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the internal logic of cache formatting and selection in the batch manager, specifically refining how data parallel and tensor parallel ranks are considered when attention data parallelism is enabled. Adjustments are made to both production code and related test assertions, but no public interfaces are altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CacheFormatter logic update
cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/cacheFormatter.cpp
Modified needSendCache and pickRecvConnections to factor in data parallel rank when attention DP is enabled, changing selection conditions for sending cache and picking receive connections.
MLACacheFormatter logic update
cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/mlaCacheFormatter.cpp
Refined pickRecvConnections and needSendCache to introduce and use data parallel rank and tensor parallel group calculations, adjusting cache send/receive logic for attention DP scenarios.
Test expectation and formatting
cpp/tests/batch_manager/cacheTransceiverTest.cpp
Swapped two test assertions for expected cache send behavior under context DP, and made minor formatting changes for readability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Sender as CacheSender
    participant Receiver as CacheReceiver
    participant Formatter as CacheFormatter/MLACacheFormatter

    Sender->>Formatter: needSendCache(destRank, ...)
    Formatter->>Sender: Returns true/false based on DP/TP logic

    Receiver->>Formatter: pickRecvConnections(...)
    Formatter->>Receiver: Returns list of connections based on DP/TP logic
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • chzblych
  • pcastonguay
  • HuiGao-NV
  • Shixiaowei02
  • achartier

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 907c180 and 152fd01.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/cacheFormatter.cpp (2 hunks)
  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/mlaCacheFormatter.cpp (3 hunks)
  • cpp/tests/batch_manager/cacheTransceiverTest.cpp (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: amitz-nv
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#5616
File: tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py:375-384
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T09:01:27.402Z
Learning: In tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py, the LoRA adapter cache optimization logic that checks `is_adapter_in_cpu_cache()` and conditionally passes None for weights/config has a known race condition issue that cannot be solved with simple error handling or verification checks. This is a known limitation that requires a more comprehensive solution.
📚 Learning: in tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py, the lora adapter cache optimization logic that checks `is_adapte...
Learnt from: amitz-nv
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#5616
File: tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py:375-384
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T09:01:27.402Z
Learning: In tensorrt_llm/executor/worker.py, the LoRA adapter cache optimization logic that checks `is_adapter_in_cpu_cache()` and conditionally passes None for weights/config has a known race condition issue that cannot be solved with simple error handling or verification checks. This is a known limitation that requires a more comprehensive solution.

Applied to files:

  • cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/mlaCacheFormatter.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cpp/tests/batch_manager/cacheTransceiverTest.cpp (3)

460-460: LGTM! Improved test readability.

The blank line additions around verifyContext calls enhance code readability without affecting functionality.

Also applies to: 463-463, 468-468


569-569: LGTM! Test assertion updated to reflect refined cache sending logic.

The change from expectNeedSend: true to false for contextRank 0 → generationRank 1 correctly reflects the updated cache formatter logic that now incorporates data parallel rank considerations when determining cache sending decisions.


575-575: LGTM! Complementary test assertion update.

The change from expectNeedSend: false to true for contextRank 1 → generationRank 1 complements the previous assertion change and correctly validates the updated cache sending logic that considers data parallel ranks in cache transfer decisions.

cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/cacheFormatter.cpp (2)

92-94: LGTM! Proper integration of destination DP rank in cache sending logic.

The changes correctly incorporate destination data parallel rank (destDPRank) considerations into the cache sending decision. The logic appropriately:

  1. Extracts the destination DP rank when attention DP is enabled (line 92)
  2. Uses it in the modulo comparison to determine if cache should be sent (line 94)

This ensures cache sending decisions properly account for both source and destination DP rank configurations, which is essential for correct data parallel cache transfers.


131-131: LGTM! Consistent DP rank integration in receive connection selection.

The changes properly mirror the sending logic by incorporating self data parallel rank (selfDPRank) considerations into connection selection for receiving. The implementation:

  1. Extracts the self DP rank when attention DP is enabled (line 131)
  2. Uses it in the modulo comparison for connection filtering (line 136)

This maintains logical consistency between the sending (needSendCache) and receiving (pickRecvConnections) functions, ensuring proper coordination of cache transfers in data parallel scenarios.

Also applies to: 136-136

cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/mlaCacheFormatter.cpp (3)

48-53: LGTM: Proper DP rank integration for connection selection.

The logic correctly incorporates data parallel rank considerations when attention DP is enabled, falling back to rank 0 when disabled to preserve original behavior. The offset calculation properly distributes connections across DP groups.


91-92: Same verification needed for non-DP branch.

The same DP rank comparison logic is applied in the non-DP self configuration branch. This should be verified along with the DP-enabled branch above.


63-80: Please manually verify the DP-aware duplication logic in needSendCache

I wasn’t able to find another reference for this pattern in the codebase, so it’s not conclusive that the destDPRank comparison is correct. Specifically, double-check that you really want to compare against the data-parallel rank (rather than a tensor-parallel index) when deciding which KV-cache partitions to send.

Key locations to review in cpp/tensorrt_llm/batch_manager/mlaCacheFormatter.cpp:

  • Lines 79–80 (DP branch):
    return selfTPrankINDPGroup % dupHeadFactor == destDPRank;
  • Lines 91–92 (non-DP branch):
    return selfTpRank % dupHeadFactor == destDPRank;

Make sure that:
dupHeadFactor = #self_heads_per_DP_group / #dest_heads_per_DP_group
destDPRank correctly identifies which slice of the duplicated heads this recipient should get
• For all combinations of mTensorParallelism and mDPsize, every dest DP rank receives exactly its intended subset of heads

If in doubt, adding unit or integration tests over multiple DP sizes (e.g. DPsize > dupHeadFactor, DPsize < dupHeadFactor) will surface any gaps.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Signed-off-by: Chuang Zhu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chuang Zhu <[email protected]>
@chuangz0 chuangz0 force-pushed the opt_gen_dp_ctx_tp_cache_transfer branch from d074aca to 152fd01 Compare August 6, 2025 06:48
@chuangz0 chuangz0 requested review from Shixiaowei02 and removed request for schetlur-nv August 6, 2025 06:49
@chuangz0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

chuangz0 commented Aug 6, 2025

/bot run --add-multi-gpu-test

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #14260 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #14260 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #10766 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants