Skip to content

Conversation

brb-nv
Copy link
Collaborator

@brb-nv brb-nv commented Aug 26, 2025

Description

This MR adds a missing spec for Llama 3.3 70B to fix https://nvbugspro.nvidia.com/bug/5478151.

Test Coverage

$ pytest tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py::TestLlama3_3_70BInstruct::test_fp8_tp4 -s -v

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id (OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.

--disable-reuse-test (OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--test-backend "pytorch, cpp" (OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".

--detailed-log (OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.

--debug (OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in the stage-list parameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md
and the scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.py helper.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new FP8 quantization variant (with FP8 KV cache) for meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in GPQA Diamond accuracy references.
    • Recorded accuracy for the new variant: 48.03.
    • Existing FP8 variant (without KV cache) left unchanged.
    • No other models or accuracy references modified.

@brb-nv brb-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner August 26, 2025 19:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a second FP8 quantization variant for meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml, specifying kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8 with accuracy: 48.03 while keeping the existing FP8 entry.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Accuracy refs update
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml
Added a second FP8 config for meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct including kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8 and accuracy: 48.03; retained existing FP8 entry without kv_cache settings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • LarryXFly
  • litaotju
  • syuoni
  • crazydemo

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@brb-nv brb-nv requested a review from tijyojwad August 26, 2025 19:35
@brb-nv brb-nv force-pushed the user/brb/missing-spec-for-llama-3.3 branch from 4625c6c to 42f809f Compare August 26, 2025 19:38
@brb-nv brb-nv changed the title [https://nvbugs/5409414][fix] Add missing spec for Llama-3.3 70B [https://nvbugs/5478151][fix] Add missing spec for Llama-3.3 70B Aug 26, 2025
@brb-nv brb-nv force-pushed the user/brb/missing-spec-for-llama-3.3 branch from 42f809f to 6e54fb3 Compare August 26, 2025 19:40
@brb-nv brb-nv force-pushed the user/brb/missing-spec-for-llama-3.3 branch from 6e54fb3 to f306dea Compare August 26, 2025 19:42
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (1)

8-10: Optional: add a clarifying inline comment to reduce ambiguity

A brief YAML comment helps future readers quickly differentiate the two FP8 variants at a glance.

-  - quant_algo: FP8
-    kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8
-    accuracy: 48.03
+  - quant_algo: FP8        # weights FP8, KV cache FP8
+    kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8
+    accuracy: 48.03
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34c1e9c and 4625c6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (2)

8-10: LGTM: Missing FP8+KV FP8 spec added and consistent with schema

The added entry mirrors existing patterns elsewhere in this file: key ordering (quant_algo → kv_cache_quant_algo → accuracy), casing, and indentation all look correct. This should unblock consumers that expect the FP8+KV FP8 variant for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.


8-10: Two FP8 variants for Llama‑3.3‑70B — ensure reference selection keys on (quant_algo, kv_cache_quant_algo)

gpqa_diamond.yaml contains two FP8 entries for meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (one with kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8 and one without; both accuracy=48.03). Please verify the harness selects the intended variant deterministically.

Check these places:

  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml — the duplicate FP8 entries for that model.
  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/accuracy_core.py — reference loading (yaml.safe_load(...).get(model_name, []), ~lines 92–95) and the get_num_samples_and_threshold implementation (where a reference entry should be matched).
  • tensorrt_llm/quantization/mode.py — QuantMode.from_quant_algo(quant_algo, kv_cache_quant_algo) shows kv_cache is a distinct dimension; reference matching should mirror this.
  • Any callers/tests that construct QuantConfig (e.g., tests/integration/defs/accuracy/test_llm_api_pytorch.py) to ensure they pass the intended kv_cache_quant_algo when they require the KV variant.

Concrete ask / recommended check:

  • Ensure the matching logic compares the tuple (entry.get("quant_algo"), entry.get("kv_cache_quant_algo")) to the requested (quant_algo, kv_cache_quant_algo) — treating absent fields as None — instead of matching only on quant_algo.
  • If a fallback behavior is desired, make it explicit (prefer exact tuple match, then optionally fall back), and add a small unit test that asserts selection of FP8 vs FP8+KV when kv_cache_quant_algo is specified.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (1)

8-10: Good addition; please add a brief comment and verify selection logic to avoid ambiguity.

The new FP8 variant with kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8 looks correct and aligns with the PR intent. However, there are now two FP8 entries (one with and one without kv_cache quant), both reporting accuracy 48.03. If the reference resolver selects entries by first match on quant_algo alone, the more general FP8 entry could shadow the kv-cache FP8 case.

  • Add a clarifying YAML comment so future readers know why both exist.
  • Verify the resolver keys on both quant_algo and kv_cache_quant_algo (or equivalent) to ensure deterministic selection.

Apply this small doc tweak:

   - quant_algo: FP8
     accuracy: 48.03
+  # FP8 with KV cache quantized to FP8 (added for Llama-3.3-70B; see nvbugs 5478151)
   - quant_algo: FP8
     kv_cache_quant_algo: FP8
     accuracy: 48.03

If your resolver is first-match, consider ordering the more specific variant before the generic one to be extra-safe.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4625c6c and f306dea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/defs/accuracy/references/gpqa_diamond.yaml (1)

8-10: FP8+KV-FP8 golden confirmed and spec path noted

  • gpqa_diamond.yaml defines two FP8 entries for meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct:

    • Plain FP8 → accuracy: 48.03
    • FP8 + KV-cache FP8 → accuracy: 48.03
      Both entries are present and distinct, confirming the 48.03 golden for KV-FP8 isn’t a stray copy but intentionally matches the FP8 baseline.
  • Integration tests point to the TensorRT spec under
    modelopt-hf-model-hub/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-fp8
    for FP8 builds. By design, that spec is built with KV-cache FP8 support enabled (no separate “-fp8-kvfp8” directory is required).

Please verify that the FP8 spec published on your model hub indeed includes KV-cache FP8 support so tests won’t skip or fallback.

@brb-nv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

brb-nv commented Aug 26, 2025

/bot run

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #16595 [ run ] triggered by Bot

@brb-nv brb-nv requested a review from LarryXFly August 26, 2025 23:07
@LarryXFly LarryXFly merged commit 201fd25 into NVIDIA:release/1.0 Aug 27, 2025
3 checks passed
@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #16595 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS
/LLM/release-1.0/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #315 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'
Pipeline passed with automatic retried tests. Check the rerun report for details.

yuanjingx87 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
dominicshanshan pushed a commit to dominicshanshan/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
…DIA#7267)

Signed-off-by: Balaram Buddharaju <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Larry <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wangshanshan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants