Skip to content

3.0.md Content Type broken links? #906

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
willdady opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

3.0.md Content Type broken links? #906

willdady opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@willdady
Copy link
Contributor

For Content Type the examples and example links appear broken. Currently example links to #exampleObject which is non-existent. Should this link to #examples-object? It seems there is no such thing as Example Object.

Also, shouldn't the examples field be denoted as [Example Object], not Examples Array?

Or is it just the case that neither example or examples have a defined structure? If that's the case maye the type of these fields should simply be [*] and * respectively?

@willdady willdady changed the title 3.0md Content Type broken links? 3.0.md Content Type broken links? Feb 22, 2017
@webron
Copy link
Member

webron commented Feb 22, 2017

Thanks for bringing it up. We've just kicked off the process of cleaning out such errors in the docs. Having users point those out, saves us time ;)

/cc @RobDolinMS

@darrelmiller
Copy link
Member

darrelmiller commented Feb 22, 2017

@willdady Let me know if this PR fixes all of the issues you see #907

Should be fun to see if we agree on having a section name called Example Example :-)

@willdady
Copy link
Contributor Author

@darrelmiller Yep. Looks right to me. Thanks :)

webron added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2017
AndersDJohnson pushed a commit to AndersDJohnson/OpenAPI-Specification that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants