Skip to content

Dummy PR for merging 3.1.1 into main #4076

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 288 commits into from

Conversation

ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

@ralfhandl ralfhandl commented Sep 6, 2024

This is a dummy PR showing the differences between main and v3.1.1-dev after merging

Do not merge!

Once #4074 is merged, this will be replaced with a "Release PR" for merging v3.1.1-dev into main.

karenetheridge and others added 30 commits October 5, 2023 12:19
This is a more natural grouping of similar types, making the data much easier to read.
…e-style

the chart in section 4.8.12.4 shows that primitive and object types are also valid for style=simple
…v3.1.1

switch the order of these styles in the tables
…ct-extra-params

extra keywords in the reference object are permitted (v3.1.1)
Remove "redact" from wording, leaving only "obscure".

Co-authored-by: Rob Ede <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ralf Handl <[email protected]>
…d-composition

merging after discussion on the TDC call today
* Sync validate-markdown workflow with main (3.1.1)

* Match latest environment from main
Generalize description of password data type
…ples-v3.1.1

whitespace and quoting fixes in json and yaml examples (v3.1.1)
Co-authored-by: Mike Kistler <[email protected]>
Move Mutual TLS example from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1 to prepare for patch release
ralfhandl and others added 26 commits August 22, 2024 18:53
Co-authored-by: Mike Kistler <[email protected]>
…mt restrictions


Clarifies that OAS data modeling is based on the types in the `type` validation keyword, but JSON Schema keywords and formats apply (or not) based on the JSON instance data model, which does not include integers.

Co-authored-by: Mike Kistler <[email protected]>
Clarify data model types and formats
Define capital-O "Object" to make it clear why it is only occasionally
capitalized.

Use lowercase "with" in titles consistently (it was more common than
capitalized "With".  This is one of those rules that is different
depending on whose style guide you use- about half the major guides
say always lowercase, the other say always captial.  We were using
lowercase more often.

Also, fix "Working with Examples" to be a subsection of the
Example Object as otherwise it breaks the pattern of all of the
headings of its level being Object definitions.  I remember messing
with this a lot when I first posted that PR and either I just
missed this or I had some reason I have now forgotten to do it
this way.
These got lower-cased because I did not explain in the text
that the capital is significant.  The previous commit adds the
explanation (ported from 3.0.4) and this fixes the 3.1.1-specific
occurrences.
"Object" definition, etc. (3.1.1 port of OAI#3050)
…-as-message-body

3.1.1: example for "raw JSON" as message body
…urity

3.1.1: absent, empty, or incomplete security list
@ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this dummy PR

@ralfhandl ralfhandl closed this Sep 11, 2024
@ralfhandl ralfhandl deleted the 3.1.1-update-from-main branch September 11, 2024 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.