You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had a brief look into this. Most of the time is spend merging the dataframes. I think this very inefficient. But I don't know if it can be done better with your multi-index stuff. Creating the per-electron multi-index also takes some time. How long does this example file take on maxwell, and what is the hardware there?
This essentially is parallelized very efficiently, so also from my side no real need to further improve. The major game changer was the improvements done to the fill_na. Closing this.
Is this sparse and dense channels likewise? Is it mist efficient doing it this way (creating lots of dataframe and joining?)
Originally posted by @rettigl in #118 (comment)
Improvement in concatenate channels can be made to the join operation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: