chore: fix typos and clarify role naming

[sashass1315]

• AccessControl.behavior.js: corrected grammar ("begin → begins").
• AccessManager.behavior.js: updated comment to use PUBLIC_ROLE for clarity.
• ERC7579Utils.t.sol: fixed typo in comment ("fails → fail").

Summary by Sourcery

Fix typos in test comments and clarify role naming for access control tests

Chores:

• Correct the comment tense from "begin" to "begins" in AccessControl behavior tests
• Update AccessManager behavior test comment to use PUBLIC_ROLE for clarity
• Fix typo from "fails" to "fail" in ERC7579Utils solidity test comment

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Corrected grammar and terminology in test comments to improve clarity; no changes to test behavior, assertions, or outcomes.
• Documentation
  • Improved inline notes within test suites for readability and consistency.
• Style
  • Minor wording refinements (e.g., singular/plural agreement and role naming) in comments.
• Chores
  • Non-functional cleanup of test comment text. No user-facing or runtime changes.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: bfef243

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR corrects minor typos and refines comment clarity by fixing grammar and updating role naming in test files.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Fixed grammar in AccessControl test comments	Corrected “begin” to “begins” in a DefaultAdminTransfer comment	test/access/AccessControl.behavior.js
Clarified role naming in AccessManager test comments	Replaced PUBLIC with PUBLIC_ROLE in an unauthorized account error comment	test/access/manager/AccessManager.behavior.js
Fixed typo in ERC7579Utils Solidity test comment	Changed “fails” to “fail” in a comment about return value behavior	test/account/utils/draft-ERC7579Utils.t.sol

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Minor edits correcting grammar and comment text in three test files. No code, behavior, control flow, or interfaces changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Test comment corrections test/access/AccessControl.behavior.js, test/access/manager/AccessManager.behavior.js, test/account/utils/draft-ERC7579Utils.t.sol	Fixed grammatical/comment text (“begin”→“begins”, “PUBLIC”→“PUBLIC_ROLE” in comment, “would fails”→“would fail”). No functional changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my nose at tidy prose,
A hop, a dot, a grammar rose.
No code was moved, no tests were bent—
Just comments groomed with gentle intent.
Thump-thump! says QA’s little drum,
“Neat notes make future bugs go numb.” 🐇✏️

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbit in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbit in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbit gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbit read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbit help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbit ignore or @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbit summary or @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbit or @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

• Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

test/access/AccessControl.behavior.js (1)

467-467: Tighten comment phrasing for clarity.

“begins again to another address” reads awkwardly. Suggest “restarts the transfer to a different address”.

-          // defaultAdmin changes its mind and begins again to another address
+          // defaultAdmin changes its mind and restarts the transfer to a different address

test/access/manager/AccessManager.behavior.js (1)

45-46: Make comment consistent with similar note below (Line 90).

Prefer the same wording used later: “admin ops are not subject to target function roles.”

-                this.roles.ADMIN.id, // Although PUBLIC_ROLE is required, target function role doesn't apply to admin ops
+                this.roles.ADMIN.id, // Although PUBLIC_ROLE is required, admin ops are not subject to target function roles

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53bb340 and bfef243.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• test/access/AccessControl.behavior.js (1 hunks)
• test/access/manager/AccessManager.behavior.js (1 hunks)
• test/account/utils/draft-ERC7579Utils.t.sol (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

test/account/utils/draft-ERC7579Utils.t.sol (1)

375-376: LGTM: grammar fix improves readability.

Change is comment-only; no behavior altered.