-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
FR: implement >> operator for multitude #14831
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
From @KES777Created by @KES777This will be very handy and more meaningfull to have: Perl Info
|
From @jkeenanOn Fri Jul 31 02:06:44 2015, kes-kes@yandex.ua wrote:
Can you explain why we should do this -- especially given that '>>' is already spoken-for as a Perl operator? From pod/perlop.pod: Thank you very much.
-- |
The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open' |
From @KES777Hi, James. JEKvR> Can you explain why we should do this -- especially given that '>>' JEKvR> From pod/perlop.pod: It is often peoples do: The '>>' operator is most closer to say 'in' $value in [ qw/ a r r a y / ] If right argument is array ref (list allowed too, maybe) . It will be everything ok and make no ambiguousity into code |
From @cowensOn Mon, Aug 3, 2015, 07:20 Eugen Konkov <kes-kes@yandex.ru> wrote:
What is the value of an operator over the already existing List::Util::any Which equality operator should be used (eq, ==, =~, ~~, etc.)? How is an operator associated with bit shifting (Perl and other languages) |
@iabyn - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected' |
Migrated from rt.perl.org#125727 (status was 'rejected')
Searchable as RT125727$
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: