Skip to content

Drop in Unidata pandas workshop notebook #34

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

dcamron
Copy link
Contributor

@dcamron dcamron commented Apr 19, 2021

This is a drop-in of this notebook from our workshop materials with interactive exercises and Unidata branding removed. Otherwise has so far been unmodified, content-wise.

Notes:

  • Renders pretty well currently. Could (as all of them) use some title reorganization
  • Committed an example csv for reading in
  • Relatively self-sustaining notebook without so much crossover. Scope might be right here, but of course plenty of room for content/style review

@github-actions
Copy link

🚀 📚 Preview for git commit SHA: 95f6720 at: https://607e055d62e52b00afc9768a--pythia-foundations.netlify.app

@dcamron dcamron added the content Content related issue label Apr 20, 2021
@jukent
Copy link
Contributor

jukent commented Apr 21, 2021

Thanks for putting this together @dcamron! Are these recent PRs ready for review?

@dcamron
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcamron commented Apr 21, 2021

They are! However I'm in the process right now of putting together all of the current core package content (these 6 + @ktyle cartopy) into one rendered book on my fork and opening up a discussion allowing us to view all of them in context and talk about the larger scale picture of those pieces as they sit next to each other. We can also review and merge these individually and then begin that discussion, but our public presentation might be pretty incomplete to anyone that stumbles on it if we don't clearly announce that it's under heavy development (in my opinion).

@dcamron
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcamron commented May 27, 2021

Closing this in favor of #58 (which is based off this).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Content related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants