Validate an argument using the new api_version() method, also implement that method on wrapper classes

[sadavis1]

Fixes # n/a

Summary/Motivation:

#3699 created a new api_version() method that can be queried to determine which api version a solver object supports. Use that method to validate a solver object argument in multiple_bigm.py, rather than using isinstance in a questionable way.

Along the way I noticed that contrib LegacySolverWrapper and appsi LegacySolverInterface class instances were returning V2 and APPSI as their api versions which is not correct, so I added an override to api_version() there.

Changes proposed in this PR:

• Improve argument validation
• Override api_version() in wrapper classes as presenting the v1 api is their whole purpose

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I have read the contribution guide and agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the BSD license.
2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

[mrmundt]

We had a quick chat about this at the dev call, and the implementation is perfectly fine. I just had a residual question that I wanted answered.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.77778% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.31%. Comparing base (613f2ad) to head (3b00f60).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pyomo/contrib/appsi/base.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
pyomo/gdp/plugins/multiple_bigm.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3717   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.31%   89.31%           
=======================================
  Files         896      896           
  Lines      103670   103675    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        92589    92594    +5     
  Misses      11081    11081           

Flag	Coverage Δ
builders	29.10% <55.55%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
default	85.92% <77.77%> (?)
expensive	35.86% <55.55%> (?)
linux	86.96% <77.77%> (-2.09%)	⬇️
linux_other	86.96% <77.77%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
osx	83.10% <77.77%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
win	85.18% <77.77%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
win_other	85.18% <77.77%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.