Skip to content

Conversation

nickrobinson251
Copy link
Member

To avoid name clash with already registered Julia packages.

JuliaRegistries/General#98486 (comment)

The following guidelines were not met:

  • Package name similar to 1 existing package.
    • Similar to ObjectStores. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 is at or below cutoff of 2. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 between lowercased names is at or below cutoff of 1. Normalized visual distance 2.19 is at or below cutoff of 2.50.

Note that the guidelines are only required for the pull request to be merged automatically. However, it is strongly recommended to follow them, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

Consensus on JuliaLang slack was that our package should change name... i don't mind what we call it, although i'd prefer it to have a name not too easily confused with CloudStore.jl

This is my proposal (whatever we decide, we then need to rename the repo too)

To avoid name clash with already registered Julia packages.
@nickrobinson251 nickrobinson251 changed the title Repo package ObjectStore -> RustyObjectStore Rename package ObjectStore -> RustyObjectStore Jan 9, 2024
@nickrobinson251 nickrobinson251 merged commit 1b1ba5a into main Jan 9, 2024
@NHDaly NHDaly deleted the npr-rename-rusty branch January 9, 2024 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants