Skip to content

Conversation

oscardssmith
Copy link
Member

I'm not 100% sure this is correct, but it is a lot cleaner. It's also somewhat unclear to me why the Symbolics.jl types are getting hacked around here rather than having Symbolics overload issymbollike (possibly with a package extension).

@oscardssmith
Copy link
Member Author

oh this is somewhat annoying this is actually a recursive dependency. We need the package extension to live in Symbolics, but that will cause problems since the versions then have to be coordinated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants