Skip to content

Conversation

stefannikolei
Copy link
Contributor

@stefannikolei stefannikolei commented Mar 26, 2023

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive pull-request title
  • I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
  • I have verified that I am following the existing coding patterns and practice as demonstrated in the repository. These follow strict Stylecop rules 👮.
  • I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Benchmark:
YCbCr

Method Mean Error StdDev
Scalar 4,777.9 ns 15.98 ns 14.95 ns
SimdVector8 295.5 ns 1.07 ns 1.00 ns
SimdVectorAvx NA NA NA
SimdVectorArm 188.3 ns 0.87 ns 0.77 ns

YCCk

Method Mean Error StdDev Ratio RatioSD
Scalar 5,934.5 ns 12.66 ns 11.22 ns 1.00 0.00
SimdVector8 327.8 ns 0.74 ns 0.70 ns 0.06 0.00
SimdVectorAvx2 NA NA NA ? ?
SimdVectorArm64 228.3 ns 0.47 ns 0.42 ns 0.04 0.00

@stefannikolei stefannikolei force-pushed the stefannikolei/arm/colorconverter_ycbcrarm branch from f0a1ceb to 9dddb8c Compare March 26, 2023 12:37
@stefannikolei stefannikolei changed the title Port colorconverter YCbCr to arm Port colorconverter YCbCr and YCCk to arm Mar 27, 2023
@stefannikolei
Copy link
Contributor Author

With this all Jpeg ColorConverters have ARM specific code

@antonfirsov
Copy link
Member

This PR has to adapt the test changes from #2416 now.

@stefannikolei stefannikolei force-pushed the stefannikolei/arm/colorconverter_ycbcrarm branch from 904520d to 7b13ae2 Compare March 28, 2023 04:51
Copy link
Member

@antonfirsov antonfirsov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, if the output images look good.

Copy link
Member

@antonfirsov antonfirsov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants