-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Implement values_as_in_model using an accumulator #908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Benchmark Report for Commit c2a8e63Computer Information
Benchmark Results
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## breaking #908 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage ? 84.67%
===========================================
Files ? 37
Lines ? 4040
Branches ? 0
===========================================
Hits ? 3421
Misses ? 619
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Broader comment, since we discussed the possibility of taking VAIMAcc further just now (I opened an issue to track that too TuringLang/Turing.jl#2545). Is ValuesAsInModelAccumulator the best name, or is there something more suitable? It is a bit of a mouthful and I feel like we have a chance to rename it here
I like that it has the same name as the only function that uses it, and renaming the function would be breaking. |
The docs failure is because of GHA perms, I'll fix that on main |
Also adds a relevant test.