-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 459
refactor: remove encryption #509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
885f9a8
remove csc.rsp and delete DISABLE_CRYPTOGRAPHY blocks
0xFA11 222dd76
fix order of shutdown and singleton=null on NetworkManager.OnDestroy()
0xFA11 022098e
remove hail handshake and constants
0xFA11 72d4884
remove aeskey fields
0xFA11 8399ff3
remove encryption/cryptography from networkconfig
0xFA11 80363ab
remove SecuritySendFlags
0xFA11 671ebd5
remove security parameter xmldoc
0xFA11 cb40497
fix BeginAddQueueItemToFrame
0xFA11 3554783
remove StdRpc transport channel and stdrpc profiler markers
0xFA11 6ef3a75
removed todo comment since removing messagepacker is non-trivial task…
0xFA11 d75f0a6
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/remove-encryption
0xFA11 e26fb30
revert singleton change in ondestroy method
0xFA11 7eadff1
revert unrelated refactoring changes back
0xFA11 1c43983
revert unrelated refactoring changes back
0xFA11 9bce6cc
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/remove-encryption
0xFA11 41fd693
revert unnecessary refactoring changes
0xFA11 9631b3d
revert unnecessary refactoring changes - part 2
0xFA11 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to adjust enum values so that we don't start at 3?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, we might but I simply left that decision/discussion for later here.
(personally, I don't like starting from 0 because I think 0 should be used for empty/null/invalid/default value and not for something meaningful but anyways...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, I like the convention of mapping "None" to 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think at one time I tried making these enum's but I found that even if I declared the enum as a byte type I had to then cast it in all the function calls which made a big mess. Probably should rewrite the functions that take these to receive an actual (enum) type not a byte