Skip to content

[MLA-762] Better logging when no model + inference only #3627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 12, 2020
Merged

[MLA-762] Better logging when no model + inference only #3627

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 12, 2020

Conversation

chriselion
Copy link
Contributor

@chriselion chriselion commented Mar 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Proposed change(s)

Cherry-pick #3617 (I forgot to squash that one).

Useful links (Github issues, JIRA tickets, ML-Agents forum threads etc.)

Types of change(s)

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Code refactor
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe)

Checklist

  • Added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Updated the changelog (if applicable)
  • Updated the documentation (if applicable)
  • Updated the migration guide (if applicable)

Other comments

@chriselion chriselion changed the title Release 0.15.0 log no model [MLA-762] Better logging when no model + inference only Mar 12, 2020
@chriselion chriselion merged commit 3ad43b3 into release-0.15.0 Mar 12, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the release-0.15.0-log-no-model branch March 12, 2020 20:48
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
1 more reviewer

@vincentpierre vincentpierre vincentpierre approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@chriselion @vincentpierre