Skip to content

Conversation

lukewagner
Copy link
Member

As suggested at the end of #366 and matching the analogous change in spec/#86.

@jfbastien
Copy link
Member

Overall lgtm, though memory size versus memory_size is slightly confusing IMO. Could we call the English concept storage size instead?

@lukewagner
Copy link
Member Author

Ah, good point, agreed.

lukewagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2015
Tidy up references to memory type after #366
@lukewagner lukewagner merged commit b3e71bf into master Sep 29, 2015
@lukewagner lukewagner deleted the tidy-up-memory-type branch September 29, 2015 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants