Skip to content

Well structured rationale #479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

kripken
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken commented Nov 24, 2015

Followup for #475 as requested by @jfbastien.

Note that @sunfishcode has credit for the nested-branches idea - @sunfishcode, if you'd rather write this, that's cool with me of course.

within the `block`'s body.

In practice, outer `block`s can be used to place labels for
[any given branching pattern](Rational.md#control-flow),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the only change here is a link. the rest is due to this pull being based off of #475 which has not landed yet.

@jfbastien
Copy link
Member

Duff's device is the oft-quoted invalid usage (because it's usually slower nowadays), I think it would be useful to also mention interpreters as a valid usecase of irreducible control flow.

Otherwise lgtm.

@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Feb 24, 2016

I don't feel strongly about this old PR, closing.

@kripken kripken closed this Feb 24, 2016
@kripken kripken deleted the well-structured-rationale branch February 24, 2016 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants