Skip to content

vLLM: Processing differential in multi-channel audio downmixing enables hidden-input/moderation bypass for audio models

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 30, 2026 in vllm-project/vllm • Updated Jul 17, 2026

Package

pip vllm (pip)

Affected versions

>= 0.5.5, < 0.18.0

Patched versions

0.18.0

Description

Issue Description

Librosa defaults to using numpy.mean for mono downmixing (to_mono), while the international standard ITU-R BS.775-4 specifies a weighted downmixing algorithm. This discrepancy results in:

  • Inconsistency between audio heard by humans (e.g., through headphones/regular speakers) and audio processed by AI models (Which infra via Librosa, such as vllm, transformer).

https://github.com/librosa/librosa/blob/af8c839fb15317fa2712ea66e7a22da6a9267b32/librosa/core/audio.py#L478

Attack Scenario and Impact

LFE (Low-Frequency Effects) Channel Exploit

Attackers can craft special multichannel audio files containing:

  1. Normal content in front channels (L/R)
  2. Either interference signals or hidden content in the LFE channel

Notice: It is worth noting that not only the LFE channel is excluded, but in fact, channels beyond the 6th (such as rear surround channels, overhead channels, height speakers, etc.) are also not supported.

Attack Methodology:

Attackers can create specially engineered multichannel audio with LFE interference, where front channels (L/R) contain normal content while the LFE channel carries interference signals or hidden content. When played on consumer devices that ignore LFE channels, only the normal content is heard. However, when processed by AI systems using Librosa (which mixes all channels), the LFE interference affects speech recognition feature extraction or masks critical detection features. This enables malicious content to bypass AI detection while still reaching end users, potentially compromising voice authentication systems, evading content moderation, or disrupting speech recognition accuracy.

Potential Exploitation Scenarios:

  • Voice authentication systems may be tricked into accepting anomalous audio
  • Content moderation systems may fail to detect prohibited content hidden in LFE channels
  • Speech recognition systems may produce incorrect transcriptions

Note: torch.audio implements this correctly. Failure to do so may lead to inconsistencies between training and test audio, resulting in performance degradation.

Resources

Fixes

References

@russellb russellb published to vllm-project/vllm Mar 30, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 17, 2026
Reviewed Jul 17, 2026
Last updated Jul 17, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-34760

GHSA ID

GHSA-6c4r-fmh3-7rh8

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.