Skip to content

Rearranging Data.X.Relation #558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
MatthewDaggitt opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Rearranging Data.X.Relation #558

MatthewDaggitt opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
deprecation library-design question
Milestone
v1.0

Comments

@MatthewDaggitt
Copy link
Contributor

We need somewhere to put propositions not just binary relations over compositional data such as List. The suggestion from #556 is to move the existing Data.X.Relation hierarchy to Data.X.Relation.Binary and so make room for Data.X.Relation.Unary (and even Data.X.Relation.Trinary in the case of #529).

The old modules would be deprecated but still exist and at some point we'll get around to creating a WARNING_ON_IMPORT pragma that can be used to encourage people to migrate away from them.

Thoughts?
@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt added this to the 1.0 milestone Dec 6, 2018
@gallais
Copy link
Member

gallais commented Dec 6, 2018

Thoughts?

Trinary or Ternary?

@JacquesCarette
Copy link
Contributor

Ternary!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
deprecation library-design question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gallais @JacquesCarette @MatthewDaggitt