Deprivatising Function.Related
#413
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the proofs in
Function.Relatedthat are needed to finish off #400 are currently hidden in private scope. This makes them public and attempts to come with a consistent naming scheme. TheKstands forKindandSKforSymmetricKind.@gallais I changed your
↔-preorderas_↔_is actually the equivalence relation, not the preorder relation and therefore I think the new name is more consistent with the rest of the library.Feel free to suggest alternative names. I also considering
Kˢinstead ofSKand am undecided about which is better.