add final_url to HttpResponse #123
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'll take a look a bit later, but proposed change needs some test cases. |
|
right now ClientResponse.url reflects latest url's path, but it should be save to replace self.path with self.url in ClientRequest.send() method. |
ghost
closed this
|
ok i'll change it |
5 tasks
webknjaz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2024
…larity (#8067) **This is a backport of PR #8066 as merged into master (cba3469).** PR #8066 (cherry picked from commit cba3469) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project.
webknjaz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2024
…arity (#8068) **This is a backport of PR #8066 as merged into master (cba3469).** PR #8066 (cherry picked from commit cba3469) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project.
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
…olution if there is no throttle (#8172) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]> Fixes #123'). -->
webknjaz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2024
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Signed-off-by: crazehang <[email protected]>
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2024
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Signed-off-by: crazehang <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 28f1fd8)
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2024
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Signed-off-by: crazehang <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 28f1fd8)
Dreamsorcerer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
…ment (#8287) **This is a backport of PR #8286 as merged into master (28f1fd8).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: crazehang <[email protected]>
bdraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 4f834b6) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project.
bdraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2024
…esolver (#9047) Co-authored-by: GitNMLee <[email protected]> Fixes #9028 Fixes #123'). -->
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
…to ClientSession.__init__ (#9331) Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Fixes #123'). -->
asvetlov
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
Add `target-version` option to black config in `pyproject.toml` and reformat code. https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/usage_and_configuration/the_basics.html#t-target-version (cherry picked from commit 00fd4eb) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: Marc Mueller <[email protected]>
asvetlov
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
Add `target-version` option to black config in `pyproject.toml` and reformat code. https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/usage_and_configuration/the_basics.html#t-target-version (cherry picked from commit 00fd4eb) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: Marc Mueller <[email protected]>
bdraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
…ime is not moving forward (#10173) Co-authored-by: Bruce Merry <[email protected]> Fixes #123'). --> Fixes #10149.
bdraco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
…ime is not moving forward (#10174) Co-authored-by: Bruce Merry <[email protected]> Fixes #123'). --> Fixes #10149.
webknjaz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2025
…ifact v4 and download-artifact v4 (#10289) **This is a backport of PR #10281 as merged into master (d54b3e2).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? This updates the ci/cd workflow to use the upload-artifact v4 and download-artifact v4 github actions. The currently used upload-artifact and download-artifact will no longer work at the end of next month. The changes are needed since v4 no longer has mutable artifacts, which was used to collect wheels from different architectures. Fix #8588, Fix #8589, Fix #9009, Fix #10189, Fix #10191 ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? No, the ci/cd workflow has been tested although without publishing. ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: Simon Lamon <[email protected]>
webknjaz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2025
…ifact v4 and download-artifact v4 (#10288) **This is a backport of PR #10281 as merged into master (d54b3e2).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? This updates the ci/cd workflow to use the upload-artifact v4 and download-artifact v4 github actions. The currently used upload-artifact and download-artifact will no longer work at the end of next month. The changes are needed since v4 no longer has mutable artifacts, which was used to collect wheels from different architectures. Fix #8588, Fix #8589, Fix #9009, Fix #10189, Fix #10191 ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? No, the ci/cd workflow has been tested although without publishing. ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: Simon Lamon <[email protected]>
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2025
…#10557) **This is a backport of PR #10552 as merged into master (44e669b).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? When profiling some frequent POST requests, I found the bulk of the time was spent parsing the content-type string. Use the same strategy as we do for `parse_mimetype` to cache the parsing. ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? performance improvement ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. <img width="570" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-15 at 11 25 10 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cabaaa7c-3a39-4f90-b450-a6a0559d22d6" /> Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2025
…#10558) **This is a backport of PR #10552 as merged into master (44e669b).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? When profiling some frequent POST requests, I found the bulk of the time was spent parsing the content-type string. Use the same strategy as we do for `parse_mimetype` to cache the parsing. ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? performance improvement ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. <img width="570" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-15 at 11 25 10 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cabaaa7c-3a39-4f90-b450-a6a0559d22d6" /> Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2025
Instead of TCPConnector taking a list of sockopts to be applied sockets created, take a socket_factory callback that allows the caller to implement socket creation entirely. Fixes #10520 <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? Replace `tcp_sockopts` parameter with a `socket_factory` parameter that is a callback allowing the caller to own socket creation. If passed, all sockets created by `TCPConnector` are expected to come from the `socket_factory` callback. <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? The only users to experience a change in behavior are those who are using the un-released `tcp_sockopts` argument to `TCPConnector`. However, using unreleased code comes with caveat emptor, and is why I felt entitled to remove the option entirely without warning. <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? The burden will be minimal and would only arise if `aiohappyeyeballs` changes their interface. <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [x] I think the code is well written - [x] Unit tests for the changes exist - [x] Documentation reflects the changes - [x] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. --------- Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]>
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2025
Instead of TCPConnector taking a list of sockopts to be applied sockets created, take a socket_factory callback that allows the caller to implement socket creation entirely. Fixes #10520 <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> Replace `tcp_sockopts` parameter with a `socket_factory` parameter that is a callback allowing the caller to own socket creation. If passed, all sockets created by `TCPConnector` are expected to come from the `socket_factory` callback. <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> The only users to experience a change in behavior are those who are using the un-released `tcp_sockopts` argument to `TCPConnector`. However, using unreleased code comes with caveat emptor, and is why I felt entitled to remove the option entirely without warning. <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> The burden will be minimal and would only arise if `aiohappyeyeballs` changes their interface. <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> - [x] I think the code is well written - [x] Unit tests for the changes exist - [x] Documentation reflects the changes - [x] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. --------- Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 3b9bb1c)
bdraco
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2025
…factory (#10574) replaces and closes #10565 Instead of TCPConnector taking a list of sockopts to be applied sockets created, take a socket_factory callback that allows the caller to implement socket creation entirely. Fixes #10520 <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> Replace `tcp_sockopts` parameter with a `socket_factory` parameter that is a callback allowing the caller to own socket creation. If passed, all sockets created by `TCPConnector` are expected to come from the `socket_factory` callback. <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> The only users to experience a change in behavior are those who are using the un-released `tcp_sockopts` argument to `TCPConnector`. However, using unreleased code comes with caveat emptor, and is why I felt entitled to remove the option entirely without warning. <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> The burden will be minimal and would only arise if `aiohappyeyeballs` changes their interface. <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> - [x] I think the code is well written - [x] Unit tests for the changes exist - [x] Documentation reflects the changes - [x] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [x] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. --------- Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 3b9bb1c) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? <!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. --> ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? <!-- Outline any notable behaviour for the end users. --> ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? <!-- Stop right there! Pause. Just for a minute... Can you think of anything obvious that would complicate the ongoing development of this project? Try to consider if you'd be able to maintain it throughout the next 5 years. Does it seem viable? Tell us your thoughts! We'd very much love to hear what the consequences of merging this patch might be... This will help us assess if your change is something we'd want to entertain early in the review process. Thank you in advance! --> ## Related issue number <!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this change? --> <!-- Remember to prefix with 'Fixes' if it should close the issue (e.g. 'Fixes #123'). --> ## Checklist - [ ] I think the code is well written - [ ] Unit tests for the changes exist - [ ] Documentation reflects the changes - [ ] If you provide code modification, please add yourself to `CONTRIBUTORS.txt` * The format is <Name> <Surname>. * Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names. - [ ] Add a new news fragment into the `CHANGES/` folder * name it `<issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst` (e.g. `588.bugfix.rst`) * if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request number after creating the PR * `.bugfix`: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match pre-agreed expectations. * `.feature`: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff. * `.deprecation`: A declaration of future API removals and breaking changes in behavior. * `.breaking`: When something public is removed in a breaking way. Could be deprecated in an earlier release. * `.doc`: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build process. * `.packaging`: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and runtime assumptions. * `.contrib`: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g. Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development environment. * `.misc`: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above categories. * Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: ```rst Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`. ``` Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood, referring to what's changed compared to the last released version of this project. Co-authored-by: Tim Menninger <[email protected]>
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I added final_url to HttpResponse so one can know the final url after redirect that the response came from.
Hope you'll merge it..