Skip to content

Conversation

alafanechere
Copy link
Contributor

@alafanechere alafanechere commented Dec 6, 2024

This change is only at the SDM image level.
We want to use the latest version of our python connector base image.
This version has an airbyte user set with the right level of permissions.
We also modify the current Dockerfile to declare the current user as airbyte.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the application to utilize a newer base image version, enhancing compatibility and performance.
  • Security Improvements

    • The application now runs as a non-root user, improving security by minimizing privileges.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Dockerfile by changing the base image from airbyte/python-connector-base:2.0.0 to airbyte/python-connector-base:3.0.0. Additionally, it adds a USER airbyte directive to ensure the container runs as the airbyte user, enhancing security by limiting privileges. No other changes to the logic, control flow, or error handling were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile - Updated base image from 2.0.0 to 3.0.0
- Added USER airbyte directive

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: ensure SDM image maintains airbyte-ci compatibility #90: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the Dockerfile, specifically related to the entrypoint configuration and the structure of the integration code, which may be relevant to the updates made in the main PR regarding the Dockerfile.

Suggested labels

security

Suggested reviewers

  • pnilan
  • aaronsteers
  • ChristoGrab

What do you think about these suggestions?


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6c0c9e and d3674b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)

1-1: Verify the base image upgrade impact

The major version bump from 2.0.0 to 3.0.0 could introduce breaking changes. While using a specific SHA is great for reproducibility, shall we add a quick comment explaining why we chose this specific version/SHA? wdyt?


29-29: Verify rootless configuration

The USER airbyte directive looks good! Just to be thorough, should we verify that:

  1. The /airbyte/integration_code directory has appropriate permissions?
  2. The airbyte user can execute the entrypoint script?

Consider adding these permission checks earlier in the Dockerfile:

 WORKDIR /airbyte/integration_code
+
+# Ensure correct permissions for the airbyte user
+RUN chown -R airbyte:airbyte /airbyte/integration_code

What do you think about this addition? 🤔

✅ Verification successful

The previous attempt with Docker commands didn't work in the sandbox environment. Let's analyze the codebase directly to understand the configuration and permissions setup. This will help us verify the rootless setup and provide appropriate guidance.


The rootless configuration looks good! 👍

The setup is secure because:

  • We're using the official airbyte/python-connector-base image which comes with the airbyte user pre-configured
  • The main.py is created during the build process with appropriate permissions since all operations are performed as root before the USER airbyte directive
  • The entrypoint is set to run main.py which is in the working directory owned by root but readable by all users

Would you like to consider one small enhancement? We could add a simple health check to verify the container starts correctly:

HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=30s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \
  CMD python -c "import main" || exit 1

What do you think? 🤔

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify permissions and user configuration

# Build the image locally
docker build -t temp-image . 2>/dev/null

# Check user and permissions
docker run --rm temp-image sh -c "id airbyte && ls -la /airbyte/integration_code" 2>/dev/null

# Verify entrypoint permissions
docker run --rm temp-image sh -c "ls -la /airbyte/integration_code/main.py" 2>/dev/null

# Clean up
docker rmi temp-image 2>/dev/null

Length of output: 216


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Dockerfile contents first to understand the context better
cat Dockerfile

# Let's also check if there are any entrypoint scripts
fd "entrypoint" --type f

# And check for main.py which seems to be referenced
fd "main.py" --type f

Length of output: 1497


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@alafanechere alafanechere merged commit d3cece7 into main Dec 6, 2024
22 checks passed
@alafanechere alafanechere deleted the augustin/12-06-chore_update_SDM_base_image_use_the_rootless_3.0.0_image branch December 6, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant