Skip to content

Fix out of range #35051

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix out of range #35051

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

liferoad
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #30177


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@liferoad liferoad marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2025 21:11
@liferoad liferoad requested a review from ahmedabu98 May 26, 2025 21:11
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @Abacn for label java.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

// Throwing a runtime exception to break out of the RetryManager and signal
// to the Beam runner that the bundle should be retried, which will then
// allow an upstream DoFn to create a new stream.
throw new RuntimeException(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I understood correctly it does not fix the error, but processing and re-throw an clearer error. It still rely on runner retry. Is that correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it fails the entire bundle and track the error counts. I hope this could clean up the wrong stream. Maybe we could just RetryType.DONT_RETRY?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the error mean that the data in this stream has already been finalized to BQ? Could there be any data missing or duplicated?

// Throwing a runtime exception to break out of the RetryManager and signal
// to the Beam runner that the bundle should be retried, which will then
// allow an upstream DoFn to create a new stream.
throw new RuntimeException(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the error mean that the data in this stream has already been finalized to BQ? Could there be any data missing or duplicated?

@liferoad liferoad requested review from ahmedabu98 and Abacn June 1, 2025 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: BigQuery streaming throwing OutOfRangeException
3 participants