HADOOP-18043. Use mina-core 2.0.22 to fix LDAP unit test failures

[aajisaka]

Description of PR

HADOOP-18043 Use mina-core 2.0.22 to fix unit test failures in hadoop-auth module.

How was this patch tested?

Ran unit tests manually

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• n/a Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• n/a If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• n/a If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 50s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	12m 38s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	24m 43s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	23m 59s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	20m 28s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 5s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 0s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 58s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	shadedclient	108m 9s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 28s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	23m 2s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	23m 2s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	20m 35s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	20m 35s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 4s		the patch passed
+1 💚	xml	0m 3s		The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 59s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 58s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	shadedclient	26m 6s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	0m 26s		hadoop-project in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	3m 31s		hadoop-auth in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 49s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		187m 32s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3792/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3792
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell xml
uname	Linux ccb67c643f7d 4.15.0-163-generic #171-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 5 11:55:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / c9b1474
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3792/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	521 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-project hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth U: .
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3792/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[virajjasani]

These tests are consistently failing, hence I believe this PR should be helpful. 2.0.22 seems the highest version of mina-core we can use to prevent these failures it seems?

[aajisaka]

2.0.22 seems the highest version of mina-core we can use to prevent these failures it seems?

Yes. This PR changes the version to 2.0.22.

[virajjasani]

+1 (non-binding) for the change.

[aajisaka]

Thank you @virajjasani for your review.

@ayushtkn would you review this?

[ayushtkn]

Thanx @aajisaka for the fix

[aajisaka]

Merged. Thank you @ayushtkn for the quick response.