Skip to content

Refactor the Record by removing the schema #579

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Fokko opened this issue Apr 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Refactor the Record by removing the schema #579

Fokko opened this issue Apr 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

Fokko commented Apr 4, 2024

Feature Request / Improvement

The Record class in Typedef should not carry a schema as it does now. This is mostly for testing purposes, but it is very tempting to rely on this schema, while that shouldn't be the case.

Fokko added a commit to Fokko/iceberg-python that referenced this issue Apr 4, 2024
Fokko added a commit to Fokko/iceberg-python that referenced this issue Apr 5, 2024
HonahX pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further activity occurs. To permanently prevent this issue from being considered stale, add the label 'not-stale', but commenting on the issue is preferred when possible.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 2, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been closed because it has not received any activity in the last 14 days since being marked as 'stale'

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant