Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix the snapshot summary of a partial overwrite #1879
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the snapshot summary of a partial overwrite #1879
Changes from all commits
5bbcb11
06ceb12
ecf029d
3f211f9
b2d2c79
6ea575e
89bc935
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i ran this locally. snapshot 0 has the following metadata, which is correct
but snapshot 1, DELETE op with the positional delete, has the following metadata,
everything looks right except for the
total-records
. we started off with 5 records, and the DELETE op removed 1 record. Sototal-records
should be4
here.Is this a bug in the spark snapshot summary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. Looking at it, snapshot summary 1 seems incorrect. Could you open up an issue on the Java side? It would be good to get some historical context around this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was able to reproduce it using #1926. I'll also open an issue on the java side
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
apache/iceberg#12823 opened an issue on the java side