[POC] `rewrite-maven-plugin`: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne #2322

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-11T20:42:49Z

predecessor:

The enabler seen above gives us the change to automate such flaws; reducing unwanted friction.

leveraging:

https://docs.openrewrite.org/reference/rewrite-maven-plugin#the-dryrun-goal

rival/addition to

BUILD SUCCESS

Build breaker:

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-11T20:50:11Z

pom.xml

+            <!-- https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/2317 -->
+            <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedPrivateFields</recipe> -->
+            <!-- https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/2310 -->
+            <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods</recipe>


Pankraz76 · 2025-05-11T20:59:18Z

pom.xml

+              <execution>
+                <id>rewrite-maven-plugin</id>
+                <goals>
+                  <goal>run</goal>


here we need new goal @timtebeek failOnDryRunDetection - then we complete request @gnodet.

which fails the build if a rule cannot be validated

[POC] Modernize codebase - Automatically fix Checkstyle violations #2300

[POC] Modernize codebase - Automatically fix Checkstyle violations #2300 (comment)

failOnDryRunDetection openrewrite/rewrite-maven-plugin#984

Suggested change

<goal>run</goal>

<goal>failOnDryRunDetection</goal>

src/mdo/java/WrapperList.java

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-11T21:08:51Z

pom.xml

+                <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5.JUnit5BestPractices</recipe> -->
+                <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.CodeCleanup</recipe> -->
+                <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.CommonStaticAnalysis</recipe> -->
+                <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedLocalVariables</recipe> -->


fix:

[MNG-8729] Use correct outputStream destination; request instead of path in DefaultPluginXmlFactory#write #2312

pom.xml

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T08:03:08Z

pom.xml

+            <exportDatatables>true</exportDatatables>
+            <failOnDryRunResults>true</failOnDryRunResults>
+            <exclusions>
+              <!-- wait for suppression: RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods -->


need suppression to be exact not broad. @timtebeek

LOC and class option

its not working either:

[WARNING] The recipe produced 17 warning(s). Please report this to the recipe author.
[WARNING] These recipes would make changes to src/mdo/java/WrapperProperties.java:
[WARNING] org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods
[WARNING] These recipes would make changes to src/mdo/java/WrapperList.java:
[WARNING] org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T08:07:17Z

pom.xml

+      <plugin>
+        <groupId>org.openrewrite.maven</groupId>
+        <artifactId>rewrite-maven-plugin</artifactId>
+      </plugin>


its only active on clean install when here, why so?

pom.xml

timtebeek · 2025-05-12T12:04:58Z

As reported on the other PR as well I wouldn't fail the CI if we can post fix suggestions instead.

elharo

I don't want to introduce additional plugins into the build.
Immutability is a good idea when:
A. The API clearly indicates that promise.
B. You're not changing existing public API.

Neither of those is true here

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T13:11:53Z

2. You're not changing existing public API.

yes,

I don't want to introduce additional plugins into the build.

spot is limited to format only, while rewrite kicks in where others sign off.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T13:15:50Z

I don't want to introduce additional plugins into the build.

no body want but only computer can Command & Conquer. As we out of nature not being consistent.

comparing clean code vs runtime its an easy tradeoff as motivation is just the same like spot and check.

OpenRewrite is ATM king and the one to rule them all.

gnodet · 2025-05-12T18:18:36Z

As an alternative, could open rewrite be setup to comment on PRs ?

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T18:39:54Z

As an alternative, could open rewrite be setup to comment on PRs ?

of course, this is aimed happy path for good integration and acceptance.

Its easy to apply then, but will spam and take away, as friction we aim to automate will still happen.
Mostly to dedicated dev and pr which is fine.

But this violates fail early fail often. therefore we need failOnDryRunResults local failure and online mode. If local build is skipped then still it will be applied.

This will save community resources shifting from online to prior local run giving dev chance to learn and gain early feedback.

As happy path is clean install verify will trigger failOnDryRunResults, tempting dev to run local fixup same like with spot, but way more mighty.

openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis#544 (comment)

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-12T19:45:36Z

I don't want to introduce additional plugins into the build.

Format is limited to cosmetics. Check is just file parser too, therefore very limited.

Ideally, we would superset what Checkstyle relies on using:

PMD
SpotBugs

It's interesting to see that each tool has its niche:

PMD often passes
SpotBugs really taps in if something is sus

Checkstyle PMD Reference

Trading just a few seconds for higher code standards is generally an effort taken.

Current real world problem: Missing auto-fix effectively preventing integration.

This is where Rewrite kicks in. So we need Rewrite as enabler.

Ideally org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.CodeCleanup would sooner or later:

Fix all violations covered by other tools
Make them kind of obsolete in comparison
Yet keep them very valuable each on their own

Even when having the option, running them would make sense to really make sure. Once (and for all) fixed by Rewrite CodeCleanup, technical debt is considered non-existent anymore.

SpotBugs/PMD checks for more than 400 bug patterns.

While Rewrite aims to:

Cover all existing tools
Automate them (its dedicated super power)

Trading CPU time for maintenance and bugs avoidance seems justiciable.

[INFO] --- pmd:3.23.0:check (default) @ maven-api-di ---
[INFO] PMD version: 7.0.0
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Inject:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Inject:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Inject:27 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Inject:28 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.MojoExecutionScoped:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.MojoExecutionScoped:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.MojoExecutionScoped:27 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Named:24 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Priority:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Priority:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Priority:27 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Provides:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Provides:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Qualifier:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Qualifier:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Scope:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Scope:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.SessionScoped:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.SessionScoped:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.SessionScoped:27 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Singleton:24 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Typed:25 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Typed:26 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Typed:27 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE'.
[INFO] PMD Failure: org.apache.maven.api.di.Typed:28 Rule:UnnecessaryImport Priority:4 Unused static import 'java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME'.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-15T17:35:18Z

alternative

yes. If integrated it should live in cloud to save ci time. On other hands it needs fix on local setup so lets think about this. Rewrite will be fast, once applied.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-15T18:18:25Z

pom.xml

+          <configuration>
+            <activeRecipes>
+              <recipe>org.openrewrite.java.format.AutoFormat</recipe>
+              <recipe>org.openrewrite.java.recipes.JavaRecipeBestPractices</recipe>


Suggested change

<recipe>org.openrewrite.java.recipes.JavaRecipeBestPractices</recipe>

<recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.ReplaceCollectToListWithToList </recipe>

ReplaceCollectToListWithToList openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis#558

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-15T20:16:28Z

...st/resources/mng-0612/plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/its/it0125/DependenciesMojo.java

@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@

 import java.io.BufferedWriter;
 import java.io.File;
-import java.io.FileWriter;


security´s everybody favourite.
This might be a good example to integrate and then build up from there avoiding further friction. Giving more freedom and attention to review.

[WARNING] The recipe produced 16 warning(s). Please report this to the recipe author. [WARNING] Changes have been made to its/core-it-suite/src/test/resources/mng-0612/plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/its/it0125/DependenciesMojo.java by: [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.JavaSecurityBestPractices [WARNING] org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.BufferedWriterCreationRecipes [WARNING] org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.BufferedWriterCreationRecipes$BufferedWriterFromNewFileWriterWithFileArgumentRecipe [WARNING] Changes have been made to compat/maven-model-builder/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/model/building/FileModelSourceTest.java by: [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.JavaSecurityBestPractices [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.SecureTempFileCreation [WARNING] Changes have been made to impl/maven-core/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/graph/ProjectSelectorTest.java by: [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.JavaSecurityBestPractices [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.SecureTempFileCreation [WARNING] Changes have been made to compat/maven-compat/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/legacy/DefaultWagonManager.java by: [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.JavaSecurityBestPractices [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.SecureTempFileCreation [WARNING] Changes have been made to compat/maven-compat/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/testutils/TestFileManager.java by: [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.JavaSecurityBestPractices [WARNING] org.openrewrite.java.security.SecureTempFileCreation [WARNING] Please review and commit the results. [WARNING] Estimate time saved: 9m

gnodet · 2025-05-16T05:49:20Z

@Pankraz76 if you want to discuss such changes, you should do so on the dev mailing list rather than raising PRs. Such important changes should be discussed openly with the whole community.

Also, you should define 2 profiles, triggered by a property. Take a look at how spotless is set up.

gnodet · 2025-05-16T05:50:42Z

pom.xml

+              <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods</recipe> -->
+              <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.UnnecessaryThrows</recipe> -->
+              <!-- <recipe>org.openrewrite.java.ShortenFullyQualifiedTypeReferences</recipe> -->
+              <recipe>org.openrewrite.java.RemoveUnusedImports</recipe>


That one is unneeded, it's covered by spotless already.

ok, nice yes. Then remove.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-16T07:53:23Z

PMD or rewrite, might even do both.

Spot seems ending up being short:

Parameter 'request' is never used #2338

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-16T08:13:05Z

@Pankraz76 if you want to discuss such changes, you should do so on the dev mailing list rather than raising PRs. Such important changes should be discussed openly with the whole community.

Also, you should define 2 profiles, triggered by a property. Take a look at how spotless is set up.

yes, of course. This is just demo to fullfill request.

As he have clear leckage this should actually be in every body´s favor.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-16T08:17:43Z

openly

just writing email from my acc to [email protected] is enough right?

slawekjaranowski

We should be aware and take care about the license of openwrite and single rules.

https://docs.openrewrite.org/reference/latest-versions-of-every-openrewrite-module

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-17T11:17:45Z

yes, recent discovery seems fishy - the king is dead.

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-17T11:20:17Z

then checkstyle-stack using PMD/spotbugs seems only option - long live the king:

[POC-FIX-PMD] maven-pmd-plugin: reactivate PMD - Best practices #2331

Might use rewrite to fix legacy, by using old version. This should be legal as in past was open source. With new licence this wont be done of course.

Is this any good @timtebeek ?

timtebeek · 2025-05-18T14:20:02Z

I've spoken at length with the author linked above at Code Remix Summit last week, helped him understand and analyze the changes, and got him set up to continue his work. Despite this he came out with a deeply flawed analysis and false statements, which unfortunately are being taken at face value.

Figured I'd provide some more context about the changes made from our perspective:

https://medium.com/@timtebeek/the-openrewrite-community-potluck

You're all welcome to use and contribute to OpenRewrite for as much as you'd like; we see no reason to be hesitant at all, but understand opinions may differ. Either way I'll continue to support the Apache Maven project and users for as much as I can, as I have when talking to Apache Maven contributors over the years, especially with an eye towards changes in the upcoming v4.

elharo · 2025-05-18T15:05:20Z

This is nothing new and nothing I haven't heard before. This same thing happened with MongoDB and with other projects. A proprietary closed license wasn't the right response then and it isn't now. The correct response is to license under GPL or perhaps AGPL. The Apache license was explicitly designed to allow big corporations to build businesses and products around open source tech without contributing back to the community.

…

On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:20 PM Tim te Beek ***@***.***> wrote: *timtebeek* left a comment (apache/maven#2322) <#2322 (comment)> I've spoken at length with the author linked above at Code Remix Summit last week, helped him understand and analyze the changes, and got him set up to continue his work. Despite this he came out with a deeply flawed analysis and false statements, which unfortunately are being taken at face value. Figured I'd provide some more context about the changes made from our perspective: - ***@***.***/the-openrewrite-community-potluck ***@***.***/the-openrewrite-community-potluck-ebf36116e7a6?source=friends_link&sk=7aa496b025118a9a8fd94c7691fb0ed6> You're all welcome to use and contribute to OpenRewrite for as much as you'd like; we see no reason to be hesitant at all, but understand opinions may differ. Either way I'll continue to support the Apache Maven project and users for as much as I can, as I have when talking to Apache Maven contributors over the years, especially with an eye towards changes in the upcoming v4. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2322 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHVP2HZKC3GTVI4UMZQSXD27CJKRAVCNFSM6AAAAAB44MONN2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQOBZGAYTONBSGE> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Elliotte Rusty Harold ***@***.***

Pankraz76 · 2025-05-18T21:34:05Z

@gastaldi I think we talked about using rewrite. FYI: consider license. What do you say about it, as quarkus leverages rewrite?

Please enlighten us about Quarkus perspective on this. Thanks.

gastaldi · 2025-05-18T21:36:53Z

Please enlighten us about Quarkus perspective on this. Thanks.

@gsmet may know more about this subject

timtebeek · 2025-05-18T21:44:23Z

Please enlighten us about Quarkus perspective on this. Thanks.

@gsmet may know more about this subject

We coordinated at the time; Quarkus only uses the Apache Licensed core of OpenRewrite, including recipes moved for that specific purpose.

For Apache Maven there would similarly still be a large suite of recipes that continue to be Apache Licensed, like for instance the Apache Maven best practices, which we'll expand to cover more of the Maven 4 migration nice to haves.

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 11, 2025

[POC] editorconfig-maven-plugin: implement IDE agnostic configuration #2321

Closed

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from dd6f8d6 to cff9c06 Compare May 11, 2025 20:45

Pankraz76 commented May 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch 2 times, most recently from 9101253 to d70cd35 Compare May 11, 2025 20:57

Pankraz76 commented May 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/mdo/java/WrapperList.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Pankraz76 marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2025 21:04

Pankraz76 commented May 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

This was referenced May 11, 2025

failOnDryRunDetection openrewrite/rewrite-maven-plugin#984

Closed

[POC] Modernize codebase - Automatically fix Checkstyle violations #2300

Closed

Pankraz76 changed the title ~~[POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Remove unused private methods~~ [POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne (RemoveUnusedPrivateMethods) May 12, 2025

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from d70cd35 to 26152a3 Compare May 12, 2025 07:56

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 12, 2025

[RSPEC-S1068] Remove unused private fields #2317

Closed

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from 3ee2ff6 to 32a08dd Compare May 12, 2025 08:36

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

elharo requested changes May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 13, 2025

[POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Migrate to JUnit 5 from JUnit 4 #2330

Closed

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from 32a08dd to af2ad59 Compare May 13, 2025 11:21

Pankraz76 requested a review from elharo May 14, 2025 21:54

This was referenced May 15, 2025

extract common functionality of DefaultPluginXmlFactory #2326

Closed

Modernize codebase with Java improvements #2277

Open

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 15, 2025

ReplaceCollectToListWithToList openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis#558

Closed

Pankraz76 commented May 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from 0f8c205 to d99935a Compare May 15, 2025 20:15

Pankraz76 requested a review from gnodet May 15, 2025 20:15

Pankraz76 commented May 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

gnodet marked this pull request as draft May 16, 2025 05:49

gnodet reviewed May 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 16, 2025

Parameter 'request' is never used #2338

Closed

[POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne

606471e

Pankraz76 force-pushed the editorconfig-maven-plugin-rewrite branch from d99935a to 606471e Compare May 16, 2025 08:06

slawekjaranowski requested changes May 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

Pankraz76 closed this May 17, 2025

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 18, 2025

introduce AvoidStarImport rule via maven-checkstyle-plugin quarkusio/quarkus#46160

Closed

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request May 21, 2025

Seamless Out-of-the-Box Integration with OpenRewrite for Enhanced Adoption checkstyle/checkstyle#16948

Closed

Pankraz76 mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2025

[S1161] Add missing @Override to overriding and implementing methods #2402

Open

	<recipe>org.openrewrite.java.recipes.JavaRecipeBestPractices</recipe>
	<recipe>org.openrewrite.staticanalysis.ReplaceCollectToListWithToList </recipe>

[POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne #2322

[POC] rewrite-maven-plugin: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne #2322

Uh oh!

Conversation

Pankraz76 commented May 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 11, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

timtebeek commented May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

elharo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gnodet commented May 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 15, 2025

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gnodet commented May 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gnodet May 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 May 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 16, 2025

Uh oh!

slawekjaranowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Pankraz76 commented May 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

[POC] `rewrite-maven-plugin`: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne #2322

[POC] `rewrite-maven-plugin`: Introduce OpenRewrite by Moderne #2322

Pankraz76 commented May 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 May 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 May 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

timtebeek commented May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 commented May 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

gnodet commented May 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 commented May 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Pankraz76 commented May 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading