Add support for the rest of the megaAVR-0 chips #85
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Definitely agree on this as there's other smaller MCU in the megaAVR-0 series that lots of people are using due to the additional RAM available to use of the library compared to the smaller ATMega328P. |
|
|
|
@aentinger is there any reason why this PR can't be merged? |
per1234
added
topic: code
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's no reason why this library can't be used with other megaAVR-0 chips than the ATmega4809.
ATmega4808, ATmega3209/3208, ATmega1609/1608 and ATmega809/808 are supported in Arduino IDE using MegaCoreX.