-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
docs(idempotency): fix descriptions in Advanced
table
#3092
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks a lot for your first contribution! Please check out our contributing guidelines and don't hesitate to ask whatever you need. |
idempotency.md
idempotency.md
idempotency.md
payloadValidationJmespath
payloadValidationJmespath
Advanced
table
No related issues found. Please ensure there is an open issue related to this change to avoid significant delays or closure. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for opening the PR!
I have left a comment in one of the fields that I'd like to reword.
Also, the automation is complaining because the PR doesn't have any linked issue. Please open one and I'll link them. For future reference, here you have the process for contributions.
@dreamorosi I implemented your suggestion, and opened a PR to fix also Python's docs: aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-python#5191 |
|
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request and thank you for helping improve everyone's experience! |
Summary
Changes
Advanced
table with Powertools for AWS Lambda (Python)payloadValidationJmespath
to make it more clearIssue number: #3098
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.