-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Update GitHub Action Versions #370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on updating GitHub Actions workflow configurations across multiple files in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Coverage Report
File CoverageNo changed files found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)
40-40
: Fix trailing whitespace.Remove trailing spaces on line 40 to comply with YAML linting rules.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 40-40: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/assign.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/assign.yml
- .github/workflows/deploy.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml
[error] 40-40: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)
14-14
: LGTM! Verify RELEASE_TOKEN permissions.The update to actions/[email protected] is appropriate. However, since this workflow has the ability to create pull requests for action updates, ensure that the RELEASE_TOKEN has the minimum required permissions.
✅ Verification successful
Token configuration is correct and documented ✓
The RELEASE_TOKEN is properly configured with the required 'workflow' scope, which is explicitly documented in the workflow file for both actions that use it. This is the minimum permission needed for this automation to function correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if RELEASE_TOKEN has appropriate permissions in repository settings gh api repos/:owner/:repo/actions/permissions/workflow | jq '.default_workflow_permissions'Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check workflow file for permissions and token usage cat .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.ymlLength of output: 655
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)
35-35
: LGTM! Consistent checkout version.The update to actions/[email protected] maintains consistency with other workflows.
47-47
: Review eslint configuration compatibility.The significant version jump in reviewdog/action-eslint (v1.20.0 → v1.33.0) might introduce new features or changed behaviors.
✅ Verification successful
The reviewdog/action-eslint version upgrade is safe to proceed.
The action merely runs ESLint and reports results to GitHub, while all ESLint configurations and plugins are managed through the project's dependencies. The version upgrade doesn't affect the ESLint setup or its behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for eslint configuration files fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml -H "\.eslintrc" # Check if any eslint plugins are defined in package.json if [ -f "package.json" ]; then jq '.dependencies,.devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("eslint-")))' package.json fiLength of output: 877
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if package.json contains eslint configuration jq '.eslintConfig' package.json # Get the content of the workflow file to see the eslint configuration cat .github/workflows/push_code_linting.ymlLength of output: 1444
43-43
: Verify compatibility with major version update.The update from v2 to v3.0.0 of markdownlint-problem-matcher is a major version bump that might include breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
The v3.0.0 upgrade of markdownlint-problem-matcher is safe to use
The problem matcher only processes the output format for GitHub UI and doesn't interact with the markdownlint rules or configuration. Your extensive .markdownlint.json configuration remains unaffected by this upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing markdownlint configuration files that might need updates fd -e yml -e yaml -e json -e jsonc -H "\.markdownlint"Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of markdownlint config cat .markdownlint.json # Look for markdownlint-related steps in the workflow rg "markdownlint" .github/workflows/ -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 4743
.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
34-34
: LGTM! Consistent checkout version.The update to actions/[email protected] maintains consistency with other workflows.
54-54
: Verify coverage report format compatibility.The update to [email protected] might introduce changes in coverage reporting. Ensure the coverage output paths and formats remain compatible.
✅ Verification successful
Coverage configuration is compatible with [email protected]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if coverage configuration exists in vitest.config files fd -e js -e ts -H "vitest.config" # Check if coverage configuration exists in package.json if [ -f "package.json" ]; then jq '.vitest' package.json fiLength of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display content of vitest.config.ts cat vitest.config.ts # Also check the action's documentation for any breaking changes gh api repos/davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action/releases/tags/v2.8.0 --jq .bodyLength of output: 1010
GitHub Actions Version Updates
Summary by CodeRabbit
pozil/auto-assign-issue
from v1.13.0 to v2.1.2actions/checkout
from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher
from v2 to v3.0.0reviewdog/action-eslint
from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action
from v2 to v2.8.0