Skip to content

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Mar 16, 2025

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded various automation workflows to the latest stable dependencies.
    • Enhanced internal processes for issue assignment, deployment, code linting, and test coverage reporting for improved performance and reliability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This update revises several GitHub Actions versions used across multiple workflow files. The changes upgrade the versions of actions such as pozil/auto-assign-issue, actions/checkout, xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/action-eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action without altering any workflow logic or conditions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.13.0 to v2.2.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml, .github/.../github_actions_version_updater.yml, .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml, .github/workflows/test.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 (or v4) to v4.2.2.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0 and reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.8.0.

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #128 for commit 0299b5d by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)

40-40: YAML Formatting: Trailing Spaces
Line 40 contains trailing spaces. Removing these will improve the file’s adherence to YAML linting best practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 0299b5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: Checkout Action Version Update
The upgrade to actions/[email protected] is consistent with the repository-wide effort to standardize on the latest versions. This ensures that all workflows benefit from recent improvements and bug fixes offered by the action.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-55: Deploy Workflow: Checkout Action Version Update
Upgrading to actions/[email protected] in the deployment workflow is a well-aligned change with other workflows. Please verify that this change does not disrupt any deployment-related behaviors.

.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Issue Auto-Assignment Action Update
The update of pozil/auto-assign-issue to v2.2.0 aligns with the overall action upgrade strategy. It is advisable to test the issue assignment behavior to confirm that no unintended changes have been introduced.

.github/workflows/test.yml (2)

34-34: Test Workflow: Checkout Action Version Update
The modification to use actions/[email protected] here maintains consistency with other workflows and should benefit from the latest improvements.


54-54: Test Workflow: Coverage Report Action Version Update
Upgrading davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.8.0 should enhance the accuracy and performance of the coverage reporting. Ensure that the report generation works as expected with the new version.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: Linting Workflow: Checkout Action Version Update
Changing to actions/[email protected] is a positive update that maintains uniformity across workflows. This helps in reducing discrepancies during checkout across different CI jobs.


43-43: Markdown Lint Matcher Action Update
The update to xt0rted/[email protected] brings in the latest improvements for markdown linting, enhancing the effectiveness of the linting feedback.


47-47: ESLint Action Update
Upgrading to reviewdog/[email protected] should improve lint reporting functionality and integrate better with GitHub PR reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant