Skip to content

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Jun 15, 2025

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated several GitHub Actions workflows to use newer versions of actions for improved reliability and security. This includes upgrades to actions for code checkout, issue assignment, linting, and test coverage reporting. No changes were made to workflow logic or user-facing functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates focus on upgrading the versions of several GitHub Actions across multiple workflow files. These changes involve specifying newer, more precise versions of actions such as actions/checkout, pozil/auto-assign-issue, markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/action-eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action. No workflow logic or control flow was modified.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue action from v1.13.0 to v2.2.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml
Updated actions/checkout action to v4.2.2 (from v4.1.1 or v4).
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0; updated reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.33.2.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.8.3.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram generated as the changes are limited to version bumps in GitHub Actions and do not affect workflow logic or control flow.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch gh-actions-update-1749949824
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #141 for commit f91908d by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

54-54: Clean up extra space and approve vitest-coverage-report-action bump
Pinning davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.8.3 is a patch-level upgrade. Remove the extra space before the action identifier to tidy YAML.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and f91908d.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Confirm compatibility of pozil/[email protected]
Major version bump from v1→v2 can introduce breaking changes—ensure the action’s inputs and behaviors remain compatible with this update.

.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: Approved: Pin actions/checkout to v4.2.2
This patch-level update is backward-compatible and aligns with other workflows.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-55: Approved: Update actions/checkout to v4.2.2
Minor patch bump—no changes to parameters, consistent with other workflows.

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

34-34: Approved: Upgrade actions/checkout to v4.2.2
Patch update only—checkout behavior remains unchanged.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: Approved: Pin actions/checkout to v4.2.2
Consistent patch-level update across CI workflows.


43-43: Verify major version bump for [email protected]
Upgrading from v2→v3 may include breaking changes—validate that the matcher’s configuration and behavior still work as expected.


47-47: Approved: Upgrade reviewdog/action-eslint to v1.33.2
Minor update within v1—no breaking changes anticipated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant