Skip to content

[DPE -3096] Fix profile limit memory config option #306

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

marceloneppel
Copy link
Member

@marceloneppel marceloneppel commented Dec 4, 2023

Issue

The profile-limit-memory config option should have underscores instead of hyphens in it's name to follow the same pattern we have for the other config options.

Solution

Deprecate the current config option and create a new one named profile_limit_memory. Keep both to release a new revision to stable and then we can remove the profile-limit-memory config option in a new release to 14/stable later.

One related unit test was updated.

renovate bot and others added 3 commits December 4, 2023 01:38
…file-limit-memory-config-option

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>
@marceloneppel marceloneppel marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 20:20
@marceloneppel marceloneppel merged commit 0d7a03a into main Dec 8, 2023
@marceloneppel marceloneppel deleted the dpe-3096-fix-profile-limit-memory-config-option branch December 8, 2023 16:55
BON4 pushed a commit to BON4/postgresql-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
* Update data-platform-workflows to v7

* Fix profile limit memory config option

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>

* Update related unit test

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>

* Add CRAFT_SHARED_CACHE env variable to charmcraft pack wrapper

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants