Skip to content

ci: make dependabot assign reviewers #1221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

ci: make dependabot assign reviewers #1221

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

dshemetov
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #1220

Summary:

  • Add dependabot workflow (tested here)

Prerequisites:

  • Unless it is a documentation hotfix it should be merged against the dev branch
  • Branch is up-to-date with the branch to be merged with, i.e. dev
  • Build is successful
  • Code is cleaned up and formatted

@dshemetov dshemetov requested a review from krivard June 28, 2023 20:29
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

krivard
krivard approved these changes Jun 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@krivard krivard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@dshemetov dshemetov merged commit 27bf48d into dev Jun 28, 2023
@dshemetov dshemetov deleted the ds/dependabot branch June 28, 2023 20:33
@dsweber2 dsweber2 mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@krivard krivard krivard approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@dshemetov @krivard