-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
Bump release to 5.4.0 #510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: inknos The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/packit test |
@jwhonce PTAL we see the infinite job flake again but the tests are passing |
f63eff2
to
c1e5e69
Compare
Signed-off-by: Nicola Sella <[email protected]>
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just as general feedback as you have asked for a review, I cannot follow any of the changes besides the obvious version number changes.
I at least would think the github action fix and tmt change must in a separate commit and explain why these are changes are made in the commit message. Like this I have no idea why they are needed, there is no link to an issue, etc... And if someone goes back later and git blame points we at something like that I would have nothing to go by why this was done.
Now I do so that the indentation in the github action but simply saying this int he commit message goes a long way for a reviewer like me.
Anyway I am not a maintainer here so merge if you like.
LGTM |
/lgtm |
No description provided.