Skip to content

Conversation

timcoding1988
Copy link
Collaborator

@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 commented Aug 6, 2025

Update the podman update container all options v2 tests. this is a change duo to CRUN changes : containers/crun#1767
we will need support both new and old values using for cpu weight calculation.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None label Aug 6, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 requested a review from Luap99 August 6, 2025 12:04
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is also a cpu.weight check in test/apiv2/20-containers.at that needs to be changed as well.

@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as draft August 6, 2025 12:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 6, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 requested review from Luap99 and removed request for Luap99 August 6, 2025 12:33
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 2 times, most recently from ec7f353 to 4ab918f Compare August 6, 2025 13:54
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 requested a review from Luap99 August 6, 2025 13:55
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 13:55
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 6, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 3 times, most recently from c444d24 to e26283f Compare August 11, 2025 14:11
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as draft August 11, 2025 14:11
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 11, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 removed the request for review from Luap99 August 11, 2025 14:11
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 4 times, most recently from d95d6ab to 3f30af9 Compare August 11, 2025 19:12
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2025 19:17
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 11, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 2 times, most recently from aed54b2 to a4b4748 Compare August 11, 2025 22:33
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as draft August 11, 2025 22:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 11, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 2 times, most recently from 434d03f to 1de27d8 Compare August 12, 2025 02:24
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you like to make a test run with the new crun to make sure both version pass please use the image id c20250812t173301z-f42f41d13 containers/automation_images#411 (comment). In fact if that passes CI we can just merge it with the image bump.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Aug 13, 2025

Oh and it seems your commit has the wrong author set, Author: shiavm006 <[email protected]>. That should be set to you of course.

@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 3 times, most recently from a145f05 to 58ec583 Compare August 14, 2025 12:30
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 requested a review from Luap99 August 14, 2025 12:32
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2025 12:32
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 14, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch 2 times, most recently from e2f5490 to 5e6d490 Compare August 19, 2025 13:29
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added machine kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny labels Aug 19, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2025
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch from 7e0b30f to 9e9961e Compare August 19, 2025 14:34
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 force-pushed the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch from 9e9961e to 2c89069 Compare August 19, 2025 14:44
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, timcoding1988

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2025
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Aug 19, 2025

@mheon @baude PTAL and merge

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None labels Aug 19, 2025
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 19, 2025

Sure, LGTM on my end

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Aug 19, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2e4418a into containers:main Aug 19, 2025
86 of 89 checks passed
@timcoding1988 timcoding1988 deleted the feat/RUN-3333_fixing-cpu-weight-test branch August 19, 2025 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. machine release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants