Skip to content

Conversation

pracucci
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does:
#3990 had the subtle con that the series labels are retained in the ValidationError. Instead of trying to solve it (which could undo the performance benefit got in that PR) I'm proposing to document it and leverage on it to further optimize the metric name extraction.

name                                                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
Distributor_Push/too_many_labels_limit_reached-12           1.26ms ± 1%    1.23ms ± 0%   -2.13%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/max_label_name_length_limit_reached-12     4.97ms ± 1%    4.95ms ± 0%     ~     (p=0.190 n=5+4)
Distributor_Push/max_label_value_length_limit_reached-12    2.96ms ± 0%    2.94ms ± 2%     ~     (p=0.190 n=4+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_old-12                       1.02ms ± 0%    0.97ms ± 0%   -5.21%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_new-12                       1.02ms ± 1%    0.97ms ± 2%   -4.87%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/all_samples_successfully_pushed-12         1.18ms ± 1%    1.13ms ± 1%   -4.37%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/ingestion_rate_limit_reached-12             874µs ± 0%     821µs ± 0%   -6.08%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)

name                                                      old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
Distributor_Push/too_many_labels_limit_reached-12           94.4kB ± 0%    91.2kB ± 0%   -3.37%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/max_label_name_length_limit_reached-12      129kB ± 0%     126kB ± 0%   -2.53%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/max_label_value_length_limit_reached-12     130kB ± 0%     126kB ± 0%   -2.51%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_old-12                        118kB ± 0%     111kB ± 0%   -5.59%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_new-12                        118kB ± 0%     111kB ± 0%   -5.64%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/all_samples_successfully_pushed-12          168kB ± 0%     162kB ± 0%   -3.75%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/ingestion_rate_limit_reached-12            85.2kB ± 0%    78.8kB ± 0%   -7.50%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)

name                                                      old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
Distributor_Push/too_many_labels_limit_reached-12            3.13k ± 0%     2.13k ± 0%  -31.93%  (p=0.000 n=5+4)
Distributor_Push/max_label_name_length_limit_reached-12      3.08k ± 0%     2.08k ± 0%     ~     (p=0.079 n=4+5)
Distributor_Push/max_label_value_length_limit_reached-12     3.08k ± 0%     2.08k ± 0%  -32.47%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_old-12                        5.03k ± 0%     3.03k ± 0%  -39.75%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/timestamp_too_new-12                        5.03k ± 0%     3.03k ± 0%  -39.75%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Distributor_Push/all_samples_successfully_pushed-12          4.04k ± 0%     2.04k ± 0%  -49.55%  (p=0.000 n=5+4)
Distributor_Push/ingestion_rate_limit_reached-12             4.03k ± 0%     2.03k ± 0%  -49.62%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

Copy link
Contributor

@pstibrany pstibrany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unstoppable! Is there more performance improvements to squeeze out?

@pracucci pracucci merged commit fd29ea4 into cortexproject:master Mar 24, 2021
@pracucci pracucci deleted the optimize-metric-name-extraction-in-distributor branch March 24, 2021 09:21
@pracucci
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there more performance improvements to squeeze out?

There's always room for improvement, but I will stop here for now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants