Revert "Add [xunit*]*
to default excluded modules filter if not specified"
#519
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #462
With #510 now we exclude from instrumentation module with embedded pdb without local source.
For this reason we could think to remove
xunit
filter from code as @tonerdo told here #510 (comment)We could keep filter as fallback in case that xunit for some reason will move embedded pdb to local folder(@onovotny talked about it here #510 (comment))
Personally I would keep filter for the moment, but yes could be unuseful/dead code.
Thoughts? @tonerdo @vagisha-nidhi @onovotny @ViktorHofer
Maybe @bradwilson could also be useful here to confirm or not something.
Ah one more thing, if someone know the name of nuget package that download pdb on output directory please let me know...so we can write code/test to skip also that case.