You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sometimes I feel that I would want to have a dumber version of matching pairs.
For example I had this code <div value={"foo"}></div> and I should have said "paste to string" but I incorrectly said "paste to inside" and ended up with <div value={""bar""}></div>.
My first instinct was that I now have too many bounds so I said "chuck bounds" which of course gave me <div value=""bar""></div>.
An implementation of matching pair that just looks to the left and to the right of the selection would be preferable in most cases I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sometimes I feel that I would want to have a dumber version of matching pairs.
For example I had this code
<div value={"foo"}></div>
and I should have said "paste to string" but I incorrectly said "paste to inside" and ended up with<div value={""bar""}></div>
.My first instinct was that I now have too many bounds so I said "chuck bounds" which of course gave me
<div value=""bar""></div>
.An implementation of matching pair that just looks to the left and to the right of the selection would be preferable in most cases I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: