Incorrect expectation in co19/LanguageFeatures/Constructor-tear-offs/named_constructor_A06_t01

[alexmarkov]

Constructor tear-off are taken from a type C with specified type arguments. So these tear-offs are already instantiated and not generic. However, all checks in this test expect to find generic functions:

co19/LanguageFeatures/Constructor-tear-offs/named_constructor_A06_t01.dart

Lines 25 to 41 in 3bbf923

	var v1 = C<dynamic, num, String>.constr;
	Expect.isTrue(v1 is
	C Function<T1 extends dynamic, T2 extends num, T3 extends String>());
	var v2 = C<dynamic, num, String>.constr1;
	Expect.isTrue(v2 is C Function<T1 extends dynamic,
	T2 extends num,
	T3 extends String>(dynamic, num));
	var v3 = C<List<int>, int, String>.constr;
	Expect.isTrue(v3 is
	C Function<T1 extends List<int>, T2 extends int, T3 extends String>());
	var v4 = C<List<int>, int, String>.constr1;
	Expect.isTrue(v3 is C Function<T1 extends List<int>,
	T2 extends int,
	T3 extends String>(List<int>, int));

In fact types of those tear-offs are C Function(), C Function(dynamic, num), C Function() and C Function(List<int>, int).

Also, the last check is performed against v3 and not v4.