Skip to content

#2119. Remove obsolete "inference-using-bounds" experimental flag #3118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@eernstg eernstg merged commit 2011443 into dart-lang:master Mar 27, 2025
2 checks passed
copybara-service bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
2025-03-28 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#3119. Fix roll failures (dart-lang/co19#3120)
2025-03-27 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#3057. Add more flow analysis tests, fix existing (dart-lang/co19#3117)
2025-03-27 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2119. Remove obsolete "inference-using-bounds" experimental flag (dart-lang/co19#3118)
2025-03-25 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#3057. Add flow analysis tests for the `for-in` statement (dart-lang/co19#3115)
2025-03-24 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#3111. Update  expected errors positions (dart-lang/co19#3113)
2025-03-24 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#3057. Add tests for the reachability of a do-while loop. (dart-lang/co19#3112)

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:analyzer-linux-release-try
Change-Id: I513c5205e80681419c2510fd817b44fd479c1c08
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/418600
Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Erik Ernst <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Thomas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants