Skip to content

Add support for emitting usage as a JSON schema #897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

natebosch
Copy link
Member

  • Vendor a copy of a library defining a JSON schema API which can output
    as a Map<String, Object?>.
  • Add a jsonSchema getter on ArgParser which is similar to usage
    but outputs a schema instead of help text.

Clients can manually support a --json-help or similar argument in the
same way they support --help.

- Vendor a copy of a library defining a JSON schema API which can output
  as a `Map<String, Object?>`.
- Add a `jsonSchema` getter on `ArgParser` which is similar to `usage`
  but outputs a schema instead of help text.

Clients can manually support a `--json-help` or similar argument in the
same way they support `--help`.
Copy link

PR Health

Breaking changes ⚠️
Package Change Current Version New Version Needed Version Looking good?
args Breaking 2.7.0 2.7.0 3.0.0
Got "2.7.0" expected >= "3.0.0" (breaking changes)
⚠️

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-breaking-check.

Changelog Entry
Package Changed Files
package:args pkgs/args/lib/src/allow_anything_parser.dart
pkgs/args/lib/src/arg_parser.dart
pkgs/args/lib/src/json_schema.dart

Changes to files need to be accounted for in their respective changelogs.

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-changelog-check.

Coverage ⚠️
File Coverage
pkgs/args/lib/src/allow_anything_parser.dart 💔 72 % ⬇️ 4 %
pkgs/args/lib/src/arg_parser.dart 💚 95 % ⬆️ 1 %
pkgs/args/lib/src/json_schema.dart 💚 17 %

This check for test coverage is informational (issues shown here will not fail the PR).

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-coverage-check.

API leaks ✔️

The following packages contain symbols visible in the public API, but not exported by the library. Export these symbols or remove them from your publicly visible API.

Package Leaked API symbols
License Headers ✔️
// Copyright (c) 2025, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
Files
no missing headers

All source files should start with a license header.

// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

// Copied from https://github.com/dart-lang/ai/blob/failures-only/pkgs/dart_mcp/lib/src/api/tools.dart
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Copied from https://github.com/dart-lang/ai/blob/failures-only/pkgs/dart_mcp/lib/src/api/tools.dart
// Copied from https://github.com/dart-lang/ai/blob/main/pkgs/dart_mcp/lib/src/api/tools.dart

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe use an exact revision, or put a date on when it was copied.

A reference to a mutable file is informative, but really useful.
If the schema changes, it's good to know if we are behind or not.

natebosch added a commit to dart-lang/ai that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Add strong language to always use the `run_tests` tool.

Add a JSON schema for the CLI arguments to the test runner. The schema
was dumped using dart-lang/core#897

Add a test for the conversion of boolean, string, and list of string
arguments, as well as overriding the reporter argument.
@lrhn
Copy link
Member

lrhn commented Jun 17, 2025

Has there been a request for this?

If we don't accept options being input as JSON, why are we giving a JSON schema for them?
(Do we accept them as JSON?)

}
if (extras.isNotEmpty) {
help = [
if (help != null) help,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can use ?help now?

// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

// Copied from https://github.com/dart-lang/ai/blob/failures-only/pkgs/dart_mcp/lib/src/api/tools.dart
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe use an exact revision, or put a date on when it was copied.

A reference to a mutable file is informative, but really useful.
If the schema changes, it's good to know if we are behind or not.

string('string'),
num('number'),
int('integer'),
bool('boolean'),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why different names and texts?

I can see that null can't work as a name, but the rest could just use the same name as the enum entry.

Then entry names are not the Dart types (not capitalized, and the Dart type for object is Map, not Object.)

final String typeName;
}

/// A JSON Schema object defining the any kind of property.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"the any"?

/// See https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference for the full
/// specification.
///
/// **Note:** Only a subset of the json schema spec is supported by these types,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

json -> JSON

StringSchema? propertyNames,
int? minProperties,
int? maxProperties,
}) =>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Could also be redirecting constructor : this.fromMap(...);. No big difference.)

if (description != null) 'description': description,
if (properties != null) 'properties': properties,
if (patternProperties != null) 'patternProperties': patternProperties,
if (required != null) 'required': required,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With null-aware elements:

ObjectSchema.fromMap({
        'type': JsonType.object.typeName,
        'title': ?title,
        'description': ?description,
        'properties': ?properties,
        'patternProperties': ?patternProperties,
        'required': ?required,
        'additionalProperties': ?additionalProperties,
        'unevaluatedProperties': ?unevaluatedProperties,
        'propertyNames': ?propertyNames,
        'minProperties': ?minProperties,
        'maxProperties': ?maxProperties,
      });

int? get maxProperties => _value['maxProperties'] as int?;
}

/// A JSON Schema definition for a String.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

String -> `String`

Or "... for a [JsonType.string]."

@@ -392,4 +393,48 @@ class ArgParser {
/// Finds the option whose name or alias matches [name], or `null` if no
/// option has that name or alias.
Option? findByNameOrAlias(String name) => options[_aliases[name] ?? name];

Map<String, Object?> get jsonSchema {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Documentation.

Why is this here? What can it be used for? By whom, and where?

].join('\n');
}
final schema = switch (option.type) {
OptionType.flag => Schema.bool(
Copy link
Member

@lrhn lrhn Jun 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just use BoolSchema directly, and probably drop the redirecting factories.

They're great for discovery, but this schema code here is completely internal, so we don't need that.

const JsonType(this.typeName);

final String typeName;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like we're not using more that ~half of these, and we're not using the allOf-etc. properties at all.

Do we need a more complicated framework to generate a relatively simple JSON structure?

properties: properties,
required: required,
).asMap();
}
Copy link
Member

@lrhn lrhn Jun 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So basically just:

  var properties = <String, Object?>{};
  var required = [];
  for (var option in _options.values) {
    if (option.hide) continue;
    var Option(:name, :type, :help) = option;
    final description = [?help,
      if (option.defaultsTo != null)  'defaults to "${option.defaultsTo}"'
      if (option.allowed?.isNotEmpty ?? false) 
         'allowed values: ${option.allowed?.join(', ')}'
    ].join('\n');
    properties[name] = {
       ...switch (type) {
         OptionType.bool => const { 'type': 'boolean' },
         OptionType.single => const { 'type': 'string' } ,
         OptionType.multi => const {
           'type': 'list',
           'items': {'type': 'string'},
         },
       }   
       if (description.isNotEmpty) 'description': description,
    };   
    if (option.mandatory) required.add(name);
  }  
  return {
    'type': 'object',
    'properties': properties,
    if (required.isNotEmpty) 'required': required
  };
}  

I'm not sure a complete JSONSchema implementation is worth it, especially one we didn't write ourselves, but is vendoring and now have to maintain anyway.

@natebosch
Copy link
Member Author

Has there been a request for this?

I used this to create a schema for the test runner which we can use in our MCP server.
dart-lang/ai#169

I don't know if it makes sense to land this here since it might be breaking, but I at least wanted a reference implementation on a shared branch.

If we don't accept options being input as JSON, why are we giving a JSON schema for them?

I had suggested adding support for a JSON argument file to a few folks in a meeting and no one thought it was a good idea. I don't have strong feelings about it either way, it's pretty easy to convert. We could move the utility which does the conversion here if we want that part shared.

extension on Map<String, Object?> {
  Iterable<String> asCliArgs() sync* {
    for (final MapEntry(:key, :value) in entries) {
      if (value is List) {
        for (final element in value) {
          yield '--$key';
          yield element as String;
        }
        continue;
      }
      yield '--$key';
      if (value is bool) continue;
      yield value as String;
    }
  }
}

https://github.com/dart-lang/ai/pull/169/files#diff-c3420b6d2d3f69afb4dbb2c88882dc2a2d324dad52cf5853b3fd23b6c9436529R269

jakemac53 pushed a commit to dart-lang/ai that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Add strong language to always use the `run_tests` tool.

Add a JSON schema for the CLI arguments to the test runner. The schema
was dumped using dart-lang/core#897

Add a test for the conversion of boolean, string, and list of string
arguments, as well as overriding the reporter argument.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants