-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
Static semantics for records #2489
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great!
accepted/future-releases/records/records-feature-specification.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, noting one point that could be debated (about casts from dynamic).
accepted/future-releases/records/records-feature-specification.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
accepted/future-releases/records/records-feature-specification.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
accepted/future-releases/records/records-feature-specification.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
accepted/future-releases/records/records-feature-specification.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I have updated this to reflect the outcome of the discussion in #2488, PTAL. |
This adds a proposed type inference specification, and incorporates records into the inference, subtyping, normalization, and upper and lower bounds documents.
cc @munificent @eernstg @lrhn @stereotype441 @jakemac53 @natebosch @kallentu @scheglov @srawlins @johnniwinther @chloestefantsova